Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bigbri73
thanks for the help. I've been messing around
with the SD300 for about a day now, and I kinda figured
that the USB thing really doesn't matter to me...I'm never
gonna print any bigger than 8X10 and with the
software, I might as well just edit colors if I have to
post-upload. The true selling point for me is the
fact that the 4 and 5mp use the same
CCD(I feel with the 400 it's almost like a Porsche driving on 4 spare tires)
tires), and I really do see SLIGHTLY more noise
in the SD400 pics. Point being I think if Canon would've
used a CCD at least closer to the SD500, it would
have been a no brainer...
What do you think?
Thanks again.
|
Well if Canon would have used a CCD closer to the SD500 then the camera would have been bigger, Canon has created one of the smallest 5 MP cameras, which rivals the Credit Card slim competition, the Canon SD400 undeniably takes better photos than the credit card type camera competition.
I'm one of people who think that the noise on the SD400 doesn't bother me too much, i can get rid of alot of it in NoiseNinja (if i can properly figure out how to use it that is lol). The addition of the low light booster on the LCD is meant to help alot aswell.
Frankly the SD300 and SD400 are both great cameras, and i think they have got far too much criticism for what they can achieve at such a small size.
Right now im in the process of deciding between the Canon SD400 and the FUJI F10. FUJI F10 takes better photo in all conditions, but i just love the feel and look of CANONs and the size is great !