Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
  #1  
Old 05-12-2005, 08:54 PM
fire365 fire365 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8
Default Favorite Lenses

Okay I’m am going to be buying a new lens when I get enough money. I was just wondering which lenses are your guys’ favorites and which you might recommend. Now I figure I need a rand from about 16-400 all in all from all my lenses. I know I’m not really going to get bellow 27mm with the magnification factor so I would say a wide zoom is out (for digital right now at least). I was thinking a good general use telephoto maybe a 80-400mm 4.5/5.6 with image stabilization VR on the Nikon side. I think this would do me well for some traveling I plan to do over the summer, a good lens for people photography. There is just one slight problem I can’t afford that lens so I’m looking for alternative now I figure I can go town to something like 200mm on the tail end since the magnification will give me about a 300 not as great but it should still be good for me. So any ideas would be nice on a lenses with some halfway decent glass in it preferably something that will work on a student’s budget. Currently all I have is my Nikon 18-70 kit lens.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 05-12-2005, 08:58 PM
Rex914 Rex914 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,215
Default

There's a lens forum for this. I just spent an hour of my time a few days ago writing up a whole buyers guide. Linked in my signature...

By the way, the crop factor doesn't literally extend your reach from 200mm to 300mm. It just gives that impression because part of the image is cropped out, giving that illusion because your FOV is smaller.
__________________
My Guides: Lens Buyer's Guide

My Gear: 40D | 17-55mm/2.8 IS | 60mm/2.8 Macro

Last edited by Rex914; 05-12-2005 at 09:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-12-2005, 09:07 PM
fire365 fire365 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 8
Default

Thanks I didn't really pay attention I guess I will head to the lens forum. Yeah I know the crop factor doesn't literaly extend your reach I was just saying that a smaller lens would be fine and the crop factor just helps me forget I can affored the really nice lenses.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-12-2005, 09:12 PM
Rex914 Rex914 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,215
Default

Unfortunately, I don't think I have any recommendations for cheap telephotos (300mm plus), so you might want to browse around that forum and find some older threads on that.
__________________
My Guides: Lens Buyer's Guide

My Gear: 40D | 17-55mm/2.8 IS | 60mm/2.8 Macro
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-12-2005, 09:32 PM
D70FAN D70FAN is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Sonoran Desert
Posts: 4,870
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fire365
Okay I’m am going to be buying a new lens when I get enough money. I was just wondering which lenses are your guys’ favorites and which you might recommend. Now I figure I need a rand from about 16-400 all in all from all my lenses. I know I’m not really going to get bellow 27mm with the magnification factor so I would say a wide zoom is out (for digital right now at least). I was thinking a good general use telephoto maybe a 80-400mm 4.5/5.6 with image stabilization VR on the Nikon side. I think this would do me well for some traveling I plan to do over the summer, a good lens for people photography. There is just one slight problem I can’t afford that lens so I’m looking for alternative now I figure I can go town to something like 200mm on the tail end since the magnification will give me about a 300 not as great but it should still be good for me. So any ideas would be nice on a lenses with some halfway decent glass in it preferably something that will work on a student’s budget. Currently all I have is my Nikon 18-70 kit lens.
Just a quick note: Take a look at the Sigma 80-400 OS.
__________________
Once you go dSLR you'll never go back
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-12-2005, 09:52 PM
Rex914 Rex914 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,215
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by George Riehm
Just a quick note: Take a look at the Sigma 80-400 OS.
For a little more elaboration on why he recommended the Sigma over the Nikon, you might want to check some reviews. If you take a peek at FM, you'll see that the Nikon didn't do too well. And if you look at what people wrote in the cons, you'll see the words "slow AF" in literally 90% of them.

The Sigma on the other hand got some positive reviews, although I'd double check other sources too to verify that.
__________________
My Guides: Lens Buyer's Guide

My Gear: 40D | 17-55mm/2.8 IS | 60mm/2.8 Macro
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2009 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.