Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
  #1  
Old 04-26-2005, 04:19 PM
TheObiJuan TheObiJuan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,350
Default Sigma & Tamron 18-200 review

The review was posted on here already. Just getting the word out to those that have not seen it.

The sigma 18-200 is just as good as the sigma 18-125 and better in many aspects. I especially love the minimal vignetting. The sigma has better build quality and even a metal lens mount. It has zoom lock, I dont know if the tamron 18-200 does.

I wish the sigma had the same true focal range that the tamron 18-200. It appears that the 200mm end of the sigma is more like 170mm or so. Or it could be that the tamron 200mm is more like 230mm.
When I get it I will do some testing.
Here are some pics that I borrowed from a Japanese review. Credit goes to them for their hard work.

I labeled and assembled them to illustrate the difference.

Note the sharpness.

Note the chromatic abboration.

This one is at 200mm at f/6.3 and 1/1250

Last edited by TheObiJuan; 04-26-2005 at 04:31 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 04-26-2005, 05:25 PM
Bluedog Bluedog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near New Orleans
Posts: 1,266
Default

Maybe I should have waited ... ... nah I'm pretty satisfied with my 18-125 for now.
__________________
.

Canon EOS 30D | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS| Canon 70-200mm f/4L | Canon Speedlite 430EX + Sto-Fen Omni Bounce | Manfrotto 3001BD & 680B/486RC2 | Hoya Super HMC Pro1 Digital Filters | Hitech ND & GND Filters | Bags > Kata R-103 + Lowepro Nova 5 AW

RawShooter | premium 2006 > My PBase Gallery

Last edited by Bluedog; 04-26-2005 at 06:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-26-2005, 08:32 PM
TheObiJuan TheObiJuan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,350
Default

here you go George.
I noticed that the 18-125 does give more contrast. The extra sharpness increases acutance, which makes images sharper. It is sharper at 125, it's maximum focal length, just like the 18-200 is very sharp at 200, it's maximum focal length. At 80mm, though, the sharpness is astounding. To tell you the truth, the only difference is the gain in "75mm" and less vignetting.



Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-26-2005, 08:33 PM
TheObiJuan TheObiJuan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,350
Default


Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-26-2005, 09:43 PM
TheObiJuan TheObiJuan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 2,350
Default

It should be worth noting that the sigma 18-125 in the 125-135 test shot was shot at f/6.3, which is stopped down 1/3 stop, where the 18-200 was wide open. This could have an effect in adition to the 18-125 being at the end of its focal range (125).
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-27-2005, 05:44 AM
Savannah Savannah is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Georgia Coast
Posts: 99
Default

I went to BH Photo to check out the Sigma 18-200 for my XT and saw this note. I was wondering if it will be compatable with future camera purchases or should I only expect to be able to use this with my current camera??

(*)Note: Not compatible with 35mm cameras or digital cameras using full-size image sensors (e.g. Canon EOS 1Ds or Kodak DCS PRO SLR/c).


BTW......Nice work and great review!!


Stacy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-27-2005, 06:47 AM
gabester gabester is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 95
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savannah
I went to BH Photo to check out the Sigma 18-200 for my XT and saw this note. I was wondering if it will be compatable with future camera purchases or should I only expect to be able to use this with my current camera??

(*)Note: Not compatible with 35mm cameras or digital cameras using full-size image sensors (e.g. Canon EOS 1Ds or Kodak DCS PRO SLR/c).


BTW......Nice work and great review!!


Stacy
Well it depends on whether your future camera will have a full-size (36 x 24 mm) sensor, just like a 35mm film frame. The two cameras mentioned above (16 MP and 14 MP) are already there. The lens will project an image on the relatively small APS-C sensor that's not much bigger than it; if you switched to a full sized sensor the image will be smaller than the sensor and the edges will look darkened (vignetting). I'm not sure what future trends will bring, but it'll be while before you're forced to trade that lens for one with a bigger image. One thing is sure though - if cameras are to remain small (small lenses), the sensor will need to remain small; the only reason the Tamron and Sigma 18-200s are as tiny as they are is because the APS-C imaging circle is small. Okay, I'm done with typing the word "small" now.

Last edited by gabester; 04-27-2005 at 06:52 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-27-2005, 06:52 AM
Ray Schnoor Ray Schnoor is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 899
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Savannah
I went to BH Photo to check out the Sigma 18-200 for my XT and saw this note. I was wondering if it will be compatable with future camera purchases or should I only expect to be able to use this with my current camera??

(*)Note: Not compatible with 35mm cameras or digital cameras using full-size image sensors (e.g. Canon EOS 1Ds or Kodak DCS PRO SLR/c).


BTW......Nice work and great review!!


Stacy
As long as your future camera purchases are not cameras with full-size image sensors. Currently, cameras with that size of sensor are considerably more expensive than your XT, but who knows about the future.

Ray.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2005, 06:25 AM
Bluedog Bluedog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Near New Orleans
Posts: 1,266
Default

Click here for more sample pics from Sigma 18-200mm ... this lens is looking pretty nice.
__________________
.

Canon EOS 30D | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 | Canon 17-40mm f/4L | Canon 24-105mm f/4L IS| Canon 70-200mm f/4L | Canon Speedlite 430EX + Sto-Fen Omni Bounce | Manfrotto 3001BD & 680B/486RC2 | Hoya Super HMC Pro1 Digital Filters | Hitech ND & GND Filters | Bags > Kata R-103 + Lowepro Nova 5 AW

RawShooter | premium 2006 > My PBase Gallery
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-24-2005, 03:08 PM
jcw122 jcw122 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 54
Default

Hmm...I'm thinking these 18-200 Sigmas will be worth it compared to the 18-125, I mean it will save me money of buying RAW vignetting correction capable software (like Nikon Capture...$100!)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2010 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.