Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   

Go Back   Digital Camera Resource Page Forums > General Topics > DCRP Site Feedback

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2008, 05:45 PM
Jeff Keller Jeff Keller is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 1,044
Default How would you change the Reviews & Info page? (Update: Launched!)

How would you change our Reviews & Info page? What columns do you think should be on the big list of cameras? Any search fields missing? Post your suggestions here.

Thanks!
__________________
Jeff Keller
Editor, Digital Camera Resource Page

Last edited by Jeff Keller; 02-14-2008 at 05:46 PM. Reason: forgot the link!
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 02-14-2008, 06:07 PM
cdifoto cdifoto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,027
Default

Maybe add a swivel/tilt lcd column with the "answer" being swivel/tilt, swivel, tilt, n/a (or no).


PS: Thanks for making quick reply easier.
__________________
Ouch.™

Last edited by cdifoto; 02-14-2008 at 06:11 PM. Reason: I'm stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2008, 06:14 PM
Nickcanada Nickcanada is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,393
Default

Initial thoughts, instead of or next to the maximum resolution post the mega pixel rating. It's an overused, misunderstood spec, but it's one that is universally recognized.

Another spec that I would like to see is the focal length range in mm not just the "zoom range". When I was recently looking for a P&S it was one of the specs I was most interested in and it's not as easy as it should be to find. IMO.
__________________
50D, ELAN 7E, 18-55mm 3.5-5.6 IS, 30mm 1.4, 85mm 1.8, 580 EX, 430 EX speedlight, Pocket wizard flex and mini.
Canon G10

Pentax P30, 50mm 2.0
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2008, 06:19 PM
cdifoto cdifoto is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,027
Default

Good points Nick. Megapickels are instantly recognizable and 6x doesn't mean squat (it's a relative penis thing), whereas 35mm-210mm equivalent does mean something.

That's another thing. I'd want to see the FL range in equivalents and not the actual FL...because the sensors vary in size. 35mm equivalent is the only true way to compare, regardless of whether you know what it actually means.
__________________
Ouch.™
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:20 PM
ILoveTifa ILoveTifa is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Indonesia
Posts: 30
Default

How about a max ISO/ASA rating option?
Like MP, the HIGH ISO option is being used as a marketing tool by many manufactures, and it is actually quite useful to make social snaps where flash is prohibited (provided that you don't mind 'watercolor' effect)

IMO, some people can benefit from this option if they're looking for a camera capable of low light photography.

And while it seems useless, how about a size option?
They can be small (Sony T2, Casio Exilim EX-Z1050), medium (Canon G9, Panasonic TZ-3), big (Canon S5IS, Fuji S9500), and SLR. I know this is how my brother shop for camera (I want a compact 12x optical zoom camera!)

Just my thoughts..
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2008, 07:29 PM
DigitalDarkroom DigitalDarkroom is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 7
Default

Search fields missing: Sensor size (i.e. 1/1.8" or 1/2.5")

Columns missing: How about next to the little boxes for reviews, add little boxes with links to take us to the sample gallery for each camera that has a gallery. Maybe a column for F-full, P-partial, or N-None manual controls.
__________________
David

Sad, cameraless newbie researching his first buy
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2008, 08:15 PM
TheWengler TheWengler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 2,815
Default

I also agree with a size option, maybe in the drop down menus (ultracompact, compact, slr-like, etc.). This seems to be a major consideration for many people. Also, under some of the menus like the MP and optical zoom maybe instead of selecting a range, a minimum should be selected (i.e. at least 6 MP instead of 6-7MP).
__________________
Lukas

Pentax K100D, DA 16-45mm f/4
Olympus OM-1, 24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.4, 200mm f/4
A tripod and a pocket full of filters

My Website

Flickr
My Seascape Book
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-14-2008, 10:55 PM
jlbz jlbz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
Default movie specs

I agree that size is useful.

I've often also wanted to search on movie characteristics: maximum size/frame rate, and also encoding (mjpeg vs. mp4, for instance).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2008, 11:01 PM
Jeff Keller Jeff Keller is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 1,044
Default Size

That's a really hard one to add a search pulldown for. How does one define what size a camera is?
__________________
Jeff Keller
Editor, Digital Camera Resource Page
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2008, 11:01 PM
piedownjoe piedownjoe is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 90
Default

Two things I would like to see: a "Date released" column, and ascending/descending sorting of columns.
__________________
Soli Deo Gloria

Canon Powershot S3 IS, Panasonic Lumix LS70, Konica KD-200Z
http://photo.surrendered.org/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2010 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.