Yeah, I'm kinda skeptical about them adding IS to the 600 series. After all, that's what the A710, G7, and to some extent, the A570 is for.
A710
What happens to the A710 and G7 when the A650/660 comes out with IS? It will be perceived as comparable to the G7 for less $ and will be perceived as a better A710 for not that much more. IOW, if you're going to spend that kind of money on an A710, why not get the A650 instead. And if you didn't want to spend that kind of money but still want IS, that's what the A570 is for. The A710 is caught in the middle.
G7
With the A660 sporting at least as many MP or more than the G7 and having IS and a tilt-swivel screen, the G7 will be seen as too expensive when you can get almost the same thing for less $.
How about this for an idea? Maybe they should do away with the A600 series, because it is causing them too many problems. Use the A500 series for more value-oriented cameras. Use the A700 series for deluxe consumer P&S (6x zoom, IS, tilt/swivel LCD, 12 MP, etc.) Then take the G series back to its original intent as a prosumer camera with pro-style features like RAW mode and ext flash hotshoe.
I don't think the pro-style G will cannibalize sales of their entry-level dSLRs. It's a different market.
__________________
Nikon: D300, D700, Nikkor: 24-70, 70-200, 70-300/VR, 24/2.8, 35/2, 50/1.4G, 60/2.8G, 180/2.8,
Sigma: 10-20, 50-150/2.8, 50/2.8, Tamron: 17-50/2.8, 28-75/2.8, Tokina: 12-24, Zeiss: 25/2.8
Olympus: E-520, E-3, 7-14, 9-18, 11-22, 12-60, 14-35/2, 14-54, 35-100/2, 50-200, 25/2.8, 35/3.5, 50/2
Panasonic: G1, Leica: 14-50, 14-150, 25/1.4
Sony: A900, 70-210/4, 50/2.8, Zeiss: 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8
P&S: Canon A710is (+CHDK RAW), Panasonic: LX3
|