Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
  #1  
Old 01-29-2007, 07:43 PM
TheAviator TheAviator is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 52
Default Nikon D40 Vs Canon Rebel XT

So the Rebel XT has 8MP's where the D40 has 6MP's. The D40 has a larger screen. They both come with the standard 18 - 55 lens.

I'm coming down to buy my camera(I want to have lots of time learning the camera before I go to Europe), and I'm not sure which to go with. I always hear good things about Canon and the XT, but I've also heard that the Nikon D40 is good as well.

I was wondering if anyone here would have an idea based off their knowledge of these 2 cameras. Suggestions and comments would REALLY be helpful. Thanks guys.

Also, if anyone knows of a camera that is 200 dollars or so more, and will get better results as far as image quality goes, please list it, I would really appreciate it.

Last edited by TheAviator; 01-29-2007 at 08:10 PM.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 01-29-2007, 08:10 PM
mattdm mattdm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 548
Default

Well, as I mentioned earlier, the D40 is reputed to have a somewhat better kit lens. But I really think the main difference comes down to feel. You need to get into a camera store and handle both of them for a while.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-29-2007, 08:15 PM
TheAviator TheAviator is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 52
Default

Well ya, I did that at Ritz, felt both the Rebel XT and the D40...Both were fine with me. So other than size and feel, they both come down to the same image results, or close to?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-29-2007, 08:27 PM
mattdm mattdm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 548
Default

In my opinion, they're in the same ballpark. I'm sure you can find people with very strong technically-detailed opinions arguing for either. I've seen awesome photos from both.

On the technical side, though, dpreview actually did side-by-side studio-sample images from both of these cameras in their D40 review. That may or may not help you decide. (Although note that they're not using the kit lens for that.)

If you're interested in going up $200 in price, you might throw the newer Canon XTi into the mix. But I'd say spend that money on accessories instead.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-29-2007, 10:16 PM
Honest Gaza Honest Gaza is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,442
Default

Harry Chapin went flying in his taxi.
__________________
Canon 50D
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 | Soligor x 1.7 TC | Nikon 6T Close-up | E-Bay Battery Grip | Canon 430EX Flash | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Lowepro Topload Zoom 2 | Lowepro Slingshot 200AW

Fuji F30
Fuji WP-FXF30 Waterproof Housing

Ali Baba.....the Thief of Bad Gags
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-29-2007, 11:11 PM
BryanMsi BryanMsi is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 44
Default Tough one

If you don't have any investment in lenses and are starting from scratch, you can really choose either one. As others have said, it really depends on which you prefer.

This is a REALLY broad generalization, but I would guess the Nikon will handle "better" and get the exposure right more often while the Canon will deliver more resolution and smoother pictures (less noise). As Ken Rockwell often says, the Nikon is the camera he'll use 90% of the time while the Canon is the camera to use if you carry a tripod or shoot prints for lab comparisons. That sounds about right.

You really can't go wrong either way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-29-2007, 11:32 PM
RichNY RichNY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanMsi View Post
As Ken Rockwell often says, the Nikon is the camera he'll use 90% of the time while the Canon is the camera to use if you carry a tripod or shoot prints for lab comparisons. That sounds about right.
Ken is to Nikon as ___________ is to Tamron.

Don't trust what you read on Ken's site- it is just plain wrong.

Q. Do you know the difference between Ken Rockwell and a used car salesman?
A. A used car salesman knows when he is lying.
__________________
_______________
Nikon D3 x2 , D300, 10.5 Fisheye, Zeiss 25, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2 VR, 300 f/2.8 AF-S II, 400 f/2.8 VR, 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8, SU-800, SB-900, 3xSB-800, 1.4x and 1.7x TC
(2) Profoto Acute 2400 packs w/4 heads, Chimera Boxes
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-30-2007, 07:24 AM
murrays murrays is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 101
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RichNY View Post
Ken is to Nikon as ___________ is to Tamron.

Don't trust what you read on Ken's site- it is just plain wrong.

Q. Do you know the difference between Ken Rockwell and a used car salesman?
A. A used car salesman knows when he is lying.
So Ken must be lying when he states that he chose to take his Nikon in the delivery room with him when his son was born??

Yeah, take Ken's advice with a grain of salt, just like anything else you read on the internet. OTOH, don't dismiss an opinion simply because you don't agree with it.

-murray
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-30-2007, 02:02 PM
some guy some guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 214
Default

I'd rather buy a used D50 than touch a D40. 3AF, 6MP, crappy feel.... D40 is marketed to the newbie. It is not scaleable unlike the XT or the D50. 3AF.... geez even my old 35mm EOS had more than 3AF! How low can Nikon go these days?
__________________

EOS 30D | EOS 350D | EOS 88 | A95
EF 50mm f1.8 MKI | EF-S 10-22 | EF 28-105 mkII | EF 17-40 F4L| EF 70-200 F4L
LowePro AW 200
Canon 550EX Speedlite
RC-1 IR Remote
Dynatran Carbon Fibre CF881 Ballhead Tripod
Dynatran Carbon Fibre CF901 Monopod

Veritas Images


VI-Blog
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-30-2007, 02:15 PM
mattdm mattdm is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 548
Default

I'm sure they're hoping even lower. It's not a D80, but it's not meant to be.

The D50 is the same 6MP, and while it's got more autofocus points, it's an older generation and slower. I'll take "better" over "more". As for "crappy feel", if you don't like smaller and lighter, okay, whatever then.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2009 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.