Hmm, how odd. I know the camera was set to AUTO, so there shouldn't have been any weird settings etc for it to consider.
Quote:
|
You may have trouble focusing until you figure out what kind of contrasty objects each camera likes to focus on, or perhaps you were trying to focus too close for the lens. I have the E-300, but it's essentially the same as E-500 in terms of focusing ability. Yes, there are times (usually very dark situations), when the lens will hunt some, but the secret is learning what kind of objects to focus on, and when to use manual focus..
|
I tried focusing across the store (150ft), across the room (20ft), and across the table (2ft) - and the focus+shutter lag happened every time. Lighting was bright (lots of fluorescent tube bulbs) and contrast varied from medium to high depending on what I aimed at (shelves, people, etc).
Hmm. Ya it's just odd b/c when the Nikon is set for AUTO, it's lag isn't noticeable at all. Steve's DigiCams says the following about the E-500:
Quote:
|
The E-500's single image shooting performance is average in the consumer dSLR class of cameras. Shutter lag, the delay between depressing the shutter and capturing the image, was 1/10 second when pre-focused, and 3/10 second including auto focus time for a high-contrast subject. Rapid shooting in single shot mode without flash captured 8 images at 8/10 second intervals, with subsequent shots at 1.6 second intervals. With flash, shots could be captured at intervals ranging between 1 and 5 seconds, depending on subject distance.
|
And that's basically the same lag as for the Nikon D50, except during rapid shooting when there's more of a difference (with the Nikon being significantly faster!!):
Quote:
|
The single image shooting performance of the D50 is very good. Shutter lag, the time delay between depressing the shutter and capturing an image, measured 1/10 second when pre-focused. Autofocus shutter lag ranged between 2/10 and 6/10 second, depending on the degree of focus change required. In single-shot mode without flash, I was able to capture 22 images at 1/2 second intervals, with subsequent images at 6/10 to 1 second intervals as the full buffer emptied. Rapid shooting with the internal flash captured images at intervals of between 1 and 4 seconds depending on the distance to the subject.
|
Well, I think I might swing past the camera store again today for yet another try. Maybe someone new will be working behind the counter, someone who can double check all my settings (?!) and either confirm or fix the lag I keep noticing. This time I think I'll try running a couple of standardised tests (on exactly the same shot.. with identical manual or auto settings) to really get a good comparison between models.
Anyway, it's good to know that it's probably NOT the camera's fault, which means that it's something that I can change/fix myself (once I figure out what I'm doing wrong). Given that, I'd be grateful for any more suggestions or ideas you might have for how I'm creating this phantom lag.
I'll let you know how the next round of comparison testing goes. Thanks!