Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
  #1  
Old 05-27-2006, 01:44 PM
MSchreuder MSchreuder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4
Default Canon S3 vs Panasonic FZ7

Hi

I am looking to buy a Ultra zoom camera. The main uses will be general family, holiday and general pictures. So far I have narrowed it down to the S3 and the FZ7.

From what I have read, the S3 has got a better CCD with better low light potential, while the FZ7 has better optics. At the moment I am leaning towards the S3 as I am sure a lot of my pictures will be indoors where I will prefer a low noise picture, and I am not sure I will be able to pick up the difference in the lenses if I tried. The other issue is the outdoor light with fringing. Which is going to give me the best overall family picures.

Another thing, would it be better to get a Wide Angle lense to go with an UltaZoon camera to help with those landscape and vacation pictures, or is the standard usually more than enough?

Regards
Michael
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 05-27-2006, 05:30 PM
scupking scupking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 223
Default

One problem with Panasonic cameras is that the pictures are noticeably noisier then other brands. I would go with the S3 or S2. I was in the same boat as you a month a go and I went with the S2 and have been extremely happy with the camera.
__________________
Nikon D40
Canon A590is

Accessories:
52mm UV Filter
52mm Circular Polarizer
52mm ND8 Filter

Lens:
Nikkor 18-55
Nikkor 55-200 vr
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-28-2006, 02:06 PM
BowerR64 BowerR64 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,162
Default

Ide rather have the S3 for a few reasons. 1. ide rather use AA batteries as i have 3 sets and i can rob the batteries from other devises or to power other devices in a pinch. Im always doing somthing with electronics and need power for somthing. 2. ide rather have a fold out screen ive found i used it more then i thought i would. The S3 has a better screen then the S2, its larger and more detailed. Smaller dot pitch i think. One thing i miss about the A510 i had was the screen was amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-28-2006, 06:54 PM
SteelyKen SteelyKen is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 2
Default

The LCD is larger (2.00" vs. 1.8") on the S3, but the pixel count is unchanged (115,000). This makes the S3 LCD screen resolution slightly worse.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-28-2006, 09:47 PM
BowerR64 BowerR64 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,162
Default

really? is it the same one as the A510? that one is good. I would love to have that LCD on my S2. I cant see them using older crappy LCDs then what the A510 has that camera came out before the S3. Could it be possible they made an error on the pixel count? who would put a large LCD in a new camera with the same pixel count as the original? that would be a little stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2006, 08:19 AM
MSchreuder MSchreuder is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks!

Another Question, is the extra price premium of the Canon over the Pana worth it? Both the S3 and the FZ7 have the same specs, yet the S3 costs the same as the FZ30. Is the quality, after sales and images that much better. Bear in mind that I live in South Africa.

Thanks
Michael
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-29-2006, 08:00 PM
scupking scupking is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Enfield, CT
Posts: 223
Default

One thing to remember is that canon didn't change much between the S2 and S3. You can pick up an S2 at a very good price. I don't think the S3 is worth the price jump over the S2.
__________________
Nikon D40
Canon A590is

Accessories:
52mm UV Filter
52mm Circular Polarizer
52mm ND8 Filter

Lens:
Nikkor 18-55
Nikkor 55-200 vr
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2006, 09:51 PM
JTL JTL is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 4,508
Default

Yawnnnnnnnn......
__________________
Some Gear: Nikon D700; Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4 G; Nikkor AF-S 24-85 3.f/5-4.5 G ED; Tamron 28-300 f/3.5-6.3 VC; Nikon SB-800; Velbon Maxi-F; Canon Pixma Pro 9000; Canon S3IS, Canon SD500; Epson 4990; Epson P5000; Wacom Intuos 3

Main Software: Capture NX2; Adobe PhotoShop CS2; Corel Paintshop Pro X2 Ultimate

Sold: Canon XT/350D, EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, Sigma 18-200 OS; Canon ET EF 25II; Kenko Pro 300 DG, Canon 430EX, Canon BG-E3.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2009 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.