Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
  #31  
Old 10-22-2009, 11:57 PM
swpars swpars is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 365
Default

I just bought (and returned) an 80-200/2.8 Nikon AF-D from KEH. Great lens, but had some backfocus. Appreciate the 14 day return policy for buying used camera gear.

But on the topic of KEH, here's something you might do.

1. Sell your D40. Pick up a used D50. I've seen some going for $200-250 on Ebay and Craigslist in good shape. The D40 should bring at least $200 for the body. Call that a wash.

2. Get a used Nikon 80-200/2.8 AF (the one ring version). Not the fastest autofocus in the world, but it should be usable for hockey shots with the f2.8 aperture.

Here's an example.

http://www.keh.com/OnLineStore/Produ...nikon%2080-200
__________________
Sam


Nikon D80, Nikkormat EL, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, 55-200mm f4-f5.6 VR AF-S Nikkor, 50mm f1.8 AF-D Nikkor, 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D Nikkor, 135mm f2.8 Nikkor-Q pre-AI, Hanimex 35mm f2.8 doorstop

www.flickr.com/photos/swpars
Reply With Quote

  #32  
Old 10-23-2009, 05:46 AM
DiamondSCattleCo DiamondSCattleCo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 132
Default

Thx for the info Sam. I've actually got a D60, so I wouldn't want to take the step back in resolution (I have _occasionally_ needed the extra), but I have been seriously thinking about a D80 or even a D90. I see D80s selling pretty reasonable these days, and could use the extra focus points.

OTOH I was planning on buying a 24-70 and 70-200 next spring anyway, so maybe I'll just bite the bullet and do the Nikon 70-200 right now and be done with it.

Thanks everyone for the input. Very much appreciated.

Rod
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 10-26-2009, 08:15 AM
VTEC_EATER VTEC_EATER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiamondSCattleCo View Post
Thx for the info Sam. I've actually got a D60, so I wouldn't want to take the step back in resolution (I have _occasionally_ needed the extra), but I have been seriously thinking about a D80 or even a D90. I see D80s selling pretty reasonable these days, and could use the extra focus points.

OTOH I was planning on buying a 24-70 and 70-200 next spring anyway, so maybe I'll just bite the bullet and do the Nikon 70-200 right now and be done with it.

Thanks everyone for the input. Very much appreciated.

Rod
Rich is looking to offload one (70-200VR) for $1500. That's a pretty decent price considering the lens is $1950US new.
__________________
Nikon D300 | Nikkor 12-24/4 | Nikkor 70-200/2.8 VR | Nikkor 50/1.8D | Sigma 18-50/2.8 | SB-800 | MB-D10
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 10-26-2009, 09:54 AM
RichNY RichNY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: NY
Posts: 1,911
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VTEC_EATER View Post
Rich is looking to offload one (70-200VR) for $1500. That's a pretty decent price considering the lens is $1950US new.
Thanks for recommending mine but it is no longer for sale.
__________________
_______________
Nikon D3 x2 , D300, 10.5 Fisheye, Zeiss 25, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2 VR, 300 f/2.8 AF-S II, 400 f/2.8 VR, 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8, SU-800, SB-900, 3xSB-800, 1.4x and 1.7x TC
(2) Profoto Acute 2400 packs w/4 heads, Chimera Boxes
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-08-2009, 04:10 AM
DiamondSCattleCo DiamondSCattleCo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 132
Default

So I was snooping around eBay yesterday and put in a last second bid on a used Sigma 70-200 HSM that the seller says is like new. Blew my budget by a hundred bucks (paid $595 Canuck bucks), but, like I told the wife, how can you put a price on the memories?

Oddly enough, she could.

Actually I think she was just happy that I hadn't dropped the money on the Nikon. Now can someone tell me why freight doesn't move on Sunday?
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-08-2009, 05:46 AM
rawpaw18 rawpaw18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Maryland's Eastern Shore
Posts: 1,893
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiamondSCattleCo View Post
but, like I told the wife, how can you put a price on the memories?

Oddly enough, she could.
Funny how they can do that.
__________________
- Rich

Nikon: D50, 18-70mm, 50mm, 70-200vr
Kenko: 12mm, 20mm, 36mm Ext Tubes
Manfrotto: 486RC2
Benro: A-327 tripod


My Flickr Photos Here
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-09-2009, 08:06 AM
VTEC_EATER VTEC_EATER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiamondSCattleCo View Post
So I was snooping around eBay yesterday and put in a last second bid on a used Sigma 70-200 HSM that the seller says is like new. Blew my budget by a hundred bucks (paid $595 Canuck bucks), but, like I told the wife, how can you put a price on the memories?

Oddly enough, she could.

Actually I think she was just happy that I hadn't dropped the money on the Nikon. Now can someone tell me why freight doesn't move on Sunday?
Nice! $595 is a good price.
__________________
Nikon D300 | Nikkor 12-24/4 | Nikkor 70-200/2.8 VR | Nikkor 50/1.8D | Sigma 18-50/2.8 | SB-800 | MB-D10
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-09-2009, 10:28 AM
photowerkz photowerkz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 303
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiamondSCattleCo View Post
Or how about the Sigma 150mm Macro HSM? Its a decent macro lens I know, but how about when used for distance shots? Anyone know if this has the same focus limitations as my old Sigma 50mm macro lens? ie: it won't focus much past 20 feet or so.
Sorry for coming inn a bit late: I have the 150 f2.8 macro and its autofocus is slooooooooow, so forget about it.
__________________
www.mariusaasheim.com
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-09-2009, 12:17 PM
VTEC_EATER VTEC_EATER is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 800
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photowerkz View Post
Sorry for coming inn a bit late: I have the 150 f2.8 macro and its autofocus is slooooooooow, so forget about it.
I hear that is pretty common for Micro lenses due to their huge focal path/sweep. Have to used the focus limiter switch? It should make focus hunting a bit quicker.
__________________
Nikon D300 | Nikkor 12-24/4 | Nikkor 70-200/2.8 VR | Nikkor 50/1.8D | Sigma 18-50/2.8 | SB-800 | MB-D10
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-09-2009, 12:20 PM
faisal faisal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Dubai, UAE
Posts: 2,465
Default

Sigma macro lens in general are sloooooooooow even with the focus limiter switch....
__________________
Film
Nikon EM, Series E lenses 50mm f1.8|28mm f1.8|100mm f2.8, Sigma 80-200mm f4.5-5.6
Minolta Riva 100AF, Sinpo PQ-3, Olympus mju-III wide 100, Yashica 635
Digital
Sony cybershot W90, cybershot T90
Canon EOS 400D|18-55mm f3.5-5.6|50mm f1.8 II|10-22mm f/3.5-4.5|85mm f1.8|430EX|BG-E3
Sigma 18-200 f3.5-6.3 OS|50mm f2.8 Macro|70-200mm f2.8 APO HSM|105mm f2.8Macro
SanDisk Extreme III 4GB*2, Lexar 1GB, Lowepro Slingshot 200AW, Manfrotto 001B|143S|026
Photo Bucket, Website, Blog, Flickr
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2009 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.