Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
  #1  
Old 11-17-2008, 07:27 AM
Ken. Ken. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 191
Default Wouldn't it be interesting if:

Leica came out with the digital equivalent of the old CL?

We were talking about this the other day. There's a huge gap between the M8 and the no viewfinder/rangefinder point and shoots. Sort of the Leica equivalent of a G10 with interchangeable lenses.
Reply With Quote

  #2  
Old 11-18-2008, 12:47 PM
AJ Gressette AJ Gressette is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Charleston, S.C.
Posts: 58
Default

I would buy one!
__________________
A.J.

Hey this looks dangerous.......You go first!

If at first you don't succeed, Skydiving is not for you!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-07-2009, 07:10 AM
Ken. Ken. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 191
Default

So here it is, after PhotoExpo, Photokina and whatever photo show, and I was hoping Leica would sneak out an smaller, less expensive, rangefinder. No, we get a green M8...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-07-2009, 10:11 PM
tim11 tim11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 3,438
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken. View Post
...I was hoping Leica would sneak out an smaller, less expensive, rangefinder....
Less expensive Leica? They are called Panasonic.
__________________
Nikon D90, D80
[[Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Nikkor 70-300mm AF F/4.0-5.6G, Sigma 18-50mm F/2.8 EX DC Macro, Sigma 105mm F2.8 EX DG Macro]] || [[2x SB800, SB24]] || [[Manfrotto 190XB]]
Fuji FinePix F30
Old training camera: Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ20
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-18-2009, 05:35 AM
Ken. Ken. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 191
Default

Maybe. Granted the CL was the weird cross breed of Minolta and Leica. The Leica branded version was "the one" to have of the two. I can see a Leica version of a micro four thirds...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-18-2009, 12:26 PM
swpars swpars is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Near Seattle, WA
Posts: 365
Default

There needs to be a digital rangefinder with M-mount under the $2000 USD price point. Since the Voigtlander Bessa in M-mount is $600 USD, theoretically it would be possible to get a digital sensor + other associated electronics in the camera body for under $1400/unit + body cost in mass production.

Cosina/Voigtlander/Zeiss should look into doing this.
__________________
Sam


Nikon D80, Nikkormat EL, Tamron 17-50mm f2.8, 55-200mm f4-f5.6 VR AF-S Nikkor, 50mm f1.8 AF-D Nikkor, 80-200mm f2.8 AF-D Nikkor, 135mm f2.8 Nikkor-Q pre-AI, Hanimex 35mm f2.8 doorstop

www.flickr.com/photos/swpars
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-18-2009, 07:47 PM
Ken. Ken. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 191
Default

I have nothing against Panasonic and they make some sweet cameras. But ""Lumix" just doesn't have the same emotional impact as "Leica". I just want one with a few settings other than "auto" in a price range less than the downpayment on a new motorcycle...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

All content, except for forum posts, is © 1997 - 2009 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
Content and images from this site may not be reposted on your website or online auction.
All trademarks are property of their respective owners.