| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
10-11-2012, 10:53 PM
#2621
 Originally Posted by TheWengler
Nice pano! I'd clone out the walkway or whatever that is on the bottom right.
Done. Crop turned out to be the best solution (refer back to original post).
Last edited by D70FAN; 10-11-2012 at 10:55 PM.
-
10-11-2012, 10:55 PM
#2622
Raven15,
Outstanding images!!!
The night shot stands out.
Last edited by D70FAN; 10-11-2012 at 10:57 PM.
-
10-12-2012, 06:38 AM
#2623
Raven,
I prefer the first two. The lighting in the second one is great. The first one actually lacks much fisheye feel since there is nothing in the field of view that seems curved more than normal.
-
10-12-2012, 03:58 PM
#2624
D70Fan - Better!
Raven - #5 is the best for me. Love the comp and shadows. Nice work!
Lukas
Camera: Anonymous
I could tell you but I wouldn't want you to get all pissy if it's the wrong brand
Flickr
500px
My Website
-
10-12-2012, 05:44 PM
#2625
 Originally Posted by D70FAN
Done. Crop turned out to be the best solution (refer back to original post).
Good choice I think. From what I recall of the original, in comparison this one cuts off the irritating object, moves the smoke stacks to a better composition, and cuts off some apparent variation in exposure to the right (I'm sure the exposure was constant, but the rotation of the camera made the exposure seem darker).
-
10-12-2012, 05:52 PM
#2626
 Originally Posted by kgosden
Raven,
I prefer the first two. The lighting in the second one is great. The first one actually lacks much fisheye feel since there is nothing in the field of view that seems curved more than normal.
Thanks (all) for the feedback. My favorites I think are 2,4,5 with honorable mention to 1,6. So pretty good agreement.
KGosden, I did a thought experiment in the mountains a long time ago (like three years) while pondering a fisheye lens at a similar location. I determined that in mountains, distortion of a fisheye lens is pretty much irrelevant compared to to the topography. However, only a fisheye or a panorama can capture the feel of the location. That picture was sort of a realization of that theory (I think I can do better eventually), but it took a long time for a good fisheye to come out at a size and price I found acceptable.
-
10-12-2012, 06:57 PM
#2627
Raven,
I did like the sense of laying in the grass i got from that first shot.
-
10-12-2012, 08:06 PM
#2628
 Originally Posted by kgosden
Raven,
I did like the sense of laying in the grass i got from that first shot.
More like crashing ungracefully through thick brush for 15 minutes, and taking the shot while tottering on a mat of pressed down brush over the edge of the pond on the verge of falling in, with brush catching me everywhere and trying to spring me into the pond and getting in the way of the shot, than laying in grass
-
10-15-2012, 02:29 AM
#2629
Typical tourist photo of a small section of the Butchart Gardens, Vancouver Island. Two-shot pano courtesy of the free Canon Photostitch software I received with my A95 compact digi-cam about a decade ago. Taken with a Nikon D7000, but the easy-to-use software still works!
Nikon D7000 and a bunch of Nikon stuff — oh, and some Canon p&s's too
-
10-15-2012, 06:54 AM
#2630
Sir Les,
Loved Butchart Gardens the time I visited it was in Spring and the bulbs were all blooming in the quarry area. Back then I had a 'high end' VGA camera so not a lot of detail in the shots. It was a great scene to play with using some of the more painterly filters in Photoshop.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
Home | News | Digital
Camera Reviews & Info | Forums | Buyers
Guide | Digital Camera Prices | FAQ | About | Advertising | Feedback
All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
|
|
|
|