| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
12-10-2007, 03:03 PM
#1101
-
12-12-2007, 02:35 PM
#1102
The second one HDR alex? i like the detail in the foreground.
Here's one of mine, not the best pic ever but ok. Some lens flare as I left my hood at home and still need to install my photoshop before i can clone it out 
-
12-13-2007, 10:04 AM
#1103
Those are some great sunset pics.
-
12-14-2007, 07:12 AM
#1104
The sun isn't up long around here this time of the year. This picture was taken 14:50, fifteen minutes later the sun had set.
-
12-14-2007, 09:13 AM
#1105
 Originally Posted by Aldor88
The sun isn't up long around here this time of the year. This picture was taken 14:50, fifteen minutes later the sun had set.

Aldor, lovely image
-
12-14-2007, 06:40 PM
#1106
A few sunrise pics. Nothing special. I think I'll need to invest in a GND filter at some point. Any recommendations as far as how many stops is most useful in a GND filter or what distribution of the ND section of the filter is most useful would be great.
Lukas
Camera: Anonymous
I could tell you but I wouldn't want you to get all pissy if it's the wrong brand
Flickr
500px
My Website
-
12-14-2007, 10:05 PM
#1107
On recommendation from this forum, I got my grad ND filter here. I got the 0.6 hard edge filter (because the Hitech filters have a softer "hard edge" than others.) The edge seems just about right. The filter does not screw onto the lens. It is rectangular, quite large actually (3 inches x 4 inches or so, I'm too lazy to go get it out and see for sure.) I just hand-hold it in front of the lens. That way I can put the graduated area precisely where I want it. Also, it's large enough to use as a simple ND filter by only holding the dark area in front of the lens. If I had it to do again though, I'd probably get the 1.2 version instead. The 0.6 density is enough to make a difference, but not a big difference. Many of the shots I want to use it with have a very large dynamic range between the earth and sky, and 0.6 is not as big as an effect as I want. And I'd like to be able to try some more "artistic," surreal effects. But, 0.6 is still enough to make a difference, and I use it quite often.
By the way, it does come with a filter holder so you don't have to hand-hold it. But I'd rather just do it myself, the only trouble is you have to hold it quite close to the lens in order to avoid reflections from behind the camera.
I used the GND here and here. In both of them, the sky would have been completely blown out if I hadn't used it, unless I seriously underexposed the whole shot.
Last edited by toriaj; 12-14-2007 at 10:11 PM.
Nikon D50, Nikkor 18-55mm, Nikkor 50mm 1.8, Sigma 70-300mm APO DG Macro, Tokina 12-24
Flickr
-
12-14-2007, 11:27 PM
#1108
 Originally Posted by toriaj
On recommendation from this forum, I got my grad ND filter here. I got the 0.6 hard edge filter (because the Hitech filters have a softer "hard edge" than others.) The edge seems just about right. The filter does not screw onto the lens. It is rectangular, quite large actually (3 inches x 4 inches or so, I'm too lazy to go get it out and see for sure.) I just hand-hold it in front of the lens. That way I can put the graduated area precisely where I want it. Also, it's large enough to use as a simple ND filter by only holding the dark area in front of the lens. If I had it to do again though, I'd probably get the 1.2 version instead. The 0.6 density is enough to make a difference, but not a big difference. Many of the shots I want to use it with have a very large dynamic range between the earth and sky, and 0.6 is not as big as an effect as I want. And I'd like to be able to try some more "artistic," surreal effects. But, 0.6 is still enough to make a difference, and I use it quite often.
By the way, it does come with a filter holder so you don't have to hand-hold it. But I'd rather just do it myself, the only trouble is you have to hold it quite close to the lens in order to avoid reflections from behind the camera.
I used the GND here and here. In both of them, the sky would have been completely blown out if I hadn't used it, unless I seriously underexposed the whole shot.
Thank you for the help. I will look at that.
Lukas
Camera: Anonymous
I could tell you but I wouldn't want you to get all pissy if it's the wrong brand
Flickr
500px
My Website
-
12-16-2007, 07:41 PM
#1109
I was sitting in my living room, the sunset was so florid, I thought there was a fire across the St. Johns River from my house. I was wrong....
Both photos taken with a little POS P and S. I photoshopped out the date and time, everything is au natural if you will.

-
12-16-2007, 07:45 PM
#1110
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
Home | News | Digital
Camera Reviews & Info | Forums | Buyers
Guide | Digital Camera Prices | FAQ | About | Advertising | Feedback
All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
|
|
|
|