Canon 135mm f2.0 and 200mm f2.8

[faisal]

I've got the temptation to add both of them to my bag. I've got the funds, I just need to take the plunge.

I do own the Sigma 70-200mm f2.8 and use a borrowed Canon 70-200mm f2.8 IS but I really like the idea of a smaller lighter fixed 200mm. Am I being unrealistic and stupid??

The 135mm is basically a replacement for my 85mm f1.8 once I go full frame by the end of this year. The 85mm is my favourite focal lenght on a crop camera. Is it as good if not better than the 85mm?? Any alternatives??

I'm getting both of these for a good price second hand in mint condition. The 135mm has 7 months warranty left.

I've always wanted a kit that were made up of primes (35,50,85,135,200). This would complete my set and so I'm tempted.

[faisal]

I bought the 135mm while my friend bought the 200mm...

[Rooz]

you got the better deal. the 135 is one of my all time favourite lens'.

[faisal]

Yep. Tried both at a concert last night and the 135mm is so much nicer in low light. Focusing was spot on as well.

[Dread Pirate Roberts]

Congrats on the acquisition.

[adam75south]

well you can always sell them for what you got them for.

[faisal]

Congrats on the acquisition.

Thanks ^_^

well you can always sell them for what you got them for.

True that. If I maintain it properly that is...

[cwphoto]

I have both these lenses, and I prefer the 200/2.8 II for outdoors as it makes a very discreet alternative to a 70-200/2.8. For weddings and portraits (and indoor events) the 135/2 wins.

Funnily I reckon the 200 is the sharper lens, but probably just copy variation.

[Nickcanada]

I miss my 200mm 2.8 and will probably buy another one someday. Haven't tried the 135mm 2.0 yet....

[faisal]

You-got-to-try-out-the-135mm.....favorite lens by a long shot!!!