Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3

    Should I be looking at MP or Sensor types?

    I am wanting to replace my sony DSC-H7 (8.1MP, 1/2.5"Super HAD CCD sensor)because the zoom broke. I am looking at the Nikon Coolpix P500 (12.1MP, 1/2.3" CMOS sensor) and Sony HX-1 (1/2.4" Exmor CMOS sensor). Reviews of both newer cameras said that pictures would not be good to blow up beyond 5x7" print.This surprises me because I printed photos from my H7 to approx 12x16" and they look great. I understand that not all of my H7's photos were not large print quality, but the reviews make the Nikon and HX-1 sound like none of the photos would be good enough for enlarging.

    What features should I be looking at to try to determine what cameras take the best pictures? I won't be enlarging anything past 20x27". Thanks.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    4,173
    Both of those cameras will be fine for blowing up prints to 12x16 at minimum, you can probably go poster size if you don't plan on standing right next to them. I have no idea what reviews you were reading but they're not accurate. Now, if you take pictures in low light with high ISO you will see noise in the shots that makes large prints look bad, but that's true on your current camera as well.

    If you plan on making 20x27 prints on an occasional basis, 12MP should be fine. MP isn't really as important as image quality, since at that size you'll see some pixelation if you examine the print close up. Most people view the image from a few feet away, and image quality will be noticeable. For either of those cameras, if you are shooting sunny outside shots they will be fine. If you are shooting indoor portraits then you'll want to make sure your lighting setup is right, more than what camera you have.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Terra Australis Incognita
    Posts
    3,646
    I don't know if it holds true for P&S cameras, but a few years ago when Nikon SLR's went from CCD to CMOs the image quality became significantly better. A lot less blown skies due to higher dynamic range.
    D800, D300, D90, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200VR f2.8, 300 F4, 105 micro, 16-85VR, 50mm 1.8, Tammy 90 macro, 70-300VR, SB900, 2xSB600, MB-D10, 055XPROB 322RC2. New computers to run photoshop faster. C&C always appreciated. PhotoGallery
    Pressing the shutter is the start of the process - Joe McNally ... Buying the body is the start of the process - Dread Pirate

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    150
    Quote Originally Posted by Dread Pirate Roberts View Post
    I don't know if it holds true for P&S cameras, but a few years ago when Nikon SLR's went from CCD to CMOs the image quality became significantly better. A lot less blown skies due to higher dynamic range.
    It must be better. It seems like all of the new Canon P&S cameras (300 HS, SX230, etc) are using the 12mp CMOS sensors.

    I'll definitely enjoy the better low light performance and faster FPS.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3
    I am pretty sure the CMOS is the better choice especially because Sony has stopped using the Super HAD CCD in the cameras I have looked at.

    Thanks a lot guys for the help.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).