Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 8 of 8
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    260

    Is the telephoto upgrade worth it?

    I've been shooting college sports with my Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, and I'm thinking about upgrading to the 70-200mm f4L non-IS.

    Do you think this would be worth it for shooting basketball/tennis/etc?
    Because Words Can't Describe It.

    Flickr

    Gear:
    Canon Digital Rebel XTi 400D | Canon EF 28-105 f3.5-4.5 II USM | Canon EF 100mm Macro f2.8 | Canon 50mm f1.8 II |
    Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 | Quantaray 70-300mm f/4-5.6 | BG-E3 Battery Grip | 430EX | Tripod

    Nikon N4004s | 70-210mm
    Chinon CE-4 | 50mm
    Pentax K1000

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,675
    Outdoors....yes
    Indoors...NO
    Canon 5D MKlll & Canon 50D
    Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 | Soligor x 1.7 TC | E-Bay 50D Battery Grip | Canon 430EX Flash | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Lowepro Toploader 65 AW | Lowepro Slingshot 200AW | Kata 3n1-10

    Panasonic Lumix TZ7 (aka ZS3)

    Panasonic Lumix FT3 (aka TS3)

    Ali Baba.....the Thief of Bad Gags

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    With one of the newer bodies, you could probably get away with higher ISO. But indoors, definitely not (I agree).
    flickr

    Canon 7D - 5D | 550EX - 430EX II - (2) PW FlexTT5 | 24-105 f4L | 70-200 f2.8L IS | 100 f2.8L IS | 50 f1.8 II

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Oklahoma
    Posts
    530
    For the money your 100mm 2.8 is hard to beat. It's focus is slow because it's a macro lens. I guess save up for the 2.8 70-200L or possibly a Sigma alternative.
    Spook
    Canon EOS 50D,7D and some lens and equipment.
    Fuji F200 Exr

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,675
    Previous responses on other threads indicate the 85mm F/1.8 would be a good lens for indoors.
    Canon 5D MKlll & Canon 50D
    Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 | Soligor x 1.7 TC | E-Bay 50D Battery Grip | Canon 430EX Flash | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Lowepro Toploader 65 AW | Lowepro Slingshot 200AW | Kata 3n1-10

    Panasonic Lumix TZ7 (aka ZS3)

    Panasonic Lumix FT3 (aka TS3)

    Ali Baba.....the Thief of Bad Gags

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    1,153
    Whats wrong with your 100 2.8 at the moment ?

    Do you find it too long too short ?

    Definitely going to want to at least keep 2.8 indoors, IS is pretty helpfull at 200mm. If you need higher shutter speeds, for basketball a 85 1.8 is hard to beat.
    Hey! Look its a shiny link! Click it!
    CasePhoto.ca

    Don't click this one, no seriously... Don't!
    The Mandatory Blog

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    461

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by cdr116 View Post
    I've been shooting college sports with my Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, and I'm thinking about upgrading to the 70-200mm f4L non-IS.

    Do you think this would be worth it for shooting basketball/tennis/etc?
    No. I own the 28-135 IS and 70-200 f4 "L".
    Either would serve you well outdoors but as noted, the 70-200 f/4 (both) can be (Can be) problematic in poor lighting.

    Better? My new "[Wundekamera" EOS T21 is a very good camera body with both my lenses due to its very good "low light" imaging capacity.
    You would also appreciate the T2i's HD movies.
    EOS 1-D, EOS 1Ds, EOS 1n, EOS T2i D-SLR, EOS 1n (HS), EOS A2E(2), Olympus E-3 DSLR, E30 & E-510 DSLRs, Olympus digital FL50 flash, Canon F1 (old) + four interchangeable finders, EOS 28-70 f2.8 "L", EOS 70-200 f2.8 & f4 "Ls", EOS 430EZll digital flash, EOS 540EZ analog flash

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    461

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by cdr116 View Post
    I've been shooting college sports with my Canon 100mm 2.8 macro, and I'm thinking about upgrading to the 70-200mm f4L non-IS.

    Do you think this would be worth it for shooting basketball/tennis/etc?
    Yes.
    I own the 28-135 IS lens and 70-200 f4 "L".
    Either would serve you well outdoors but as noted, the 70-200 f/4 (both) can be (Can be) problematic in poor lighting.

    Better? My new "Wundekamera" EOS T21 is a very good camera body with both my lenses due to its very good "low light" imaging capacity.
    You would also appreciate the T2i's HD movies.
    EOS 1-D, EOS 1Ds, EOS 1n, EOS T2i D-SLR, EOS 1n (HS), EOS A2E(2), Olympus E-3 DSLR, E30 & E-510 DSLRs, Olympus digital FL50 flash, Canon F1 (old) + four interchangeable finders, EOS 28-70 f2.8 "L", EOS 70-200 f2.8 & f4 "Ls", EOS 430EZll digital flash, EOS 540EZ analog flash

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).