| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
St Patrick's Cathedral
Here is the before and after of an image I took of St Patrick's Cathedral. I tried to remove the stop light and signs.
Frank
Before

After
-
That streetlight ...
Crimony ... that streetlight looks like something out of H.G. Wells War of the Worlds.
Nice removal, Frank ... and you might suggest that the city do something a little more complimentary to that Gothic structure, in that local vicinity.
I mean, imagine, with all the high-falutin' talent in New York (cause that's where they claim it's all going), to see something like this is almost an affront to good cosmopolitan design.
Sorry, attending an Art School is providing me with some kind of lurid sensitivity to these sort of things. Who knew?
Last edited by DonSchap; 01-24-2011 at 06:07 PM.
Don Schap - BFA, Digital Photography
A Photographer Is Forever
Look, I did not create the optical laws of the Universe ... I simply learned to deal with them.
Remember: It is usually the GLASS, not the camera (except for moving to Full Frame), that gives you the most improvement in your photography.
flickr® & Sdi
-
there should be a law against those being in front of photographable things..
-
Doesn't look like much has changed since the last time I was there two years ago. Although, I thought the modern part was due to restoration work on the church and figured it would have been gone by now.
Darin Wessel
α 900
Zooms: Tamron SP AF70-200mm f2.8 Di LD Macro; Sigma 28-90mm D macro, Konica-Minolta 18-70 f3.5-5.6
Primes: Minolta 28mm f2.8; Sony 50mm f1.4
Minolta RC-1000 remote commander
Film:
Calumet Cambo CC400 4x5 View Camera
YashikaMat 6x6 TLR (other accessories)
Minolta Maxxum 7000 w/ Minolta 35-80mm f/4-5.6 & Minolta 2800 flash
Minolta Maxxum 5000i & Vivitar 728 AFM flash
What's next??? 
-
It is hard to get a good shot of anything in the city. If it isn't the wires, lights or signs it is the people and the traffic.
Thanks
Frank
-
I think you made a good job removing the lights although I am not sure I like the sky.
-
I didn't like the blown out sky. I thought it fit the image.
Thanks
Frank
-
Frank, the sky was going to blow whatever you did.
You should have made sure it was totally blown because the image is horrendously underexposed and needed at least +2 stops compensation.
-
Pete, here is another image which is I think is better exposed.
Frank
-
next time take 2 shots from slightly dif angles..enough that the light is in dif places so you can steal parts to fill behind the light in the other shot
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
Home | News | Digital
Camera Reviews & Info | Forums | Buyers
Guide | Digital Camera Prices | FAQ | About | Advertising | Feedback
All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
|
|
|
|