Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    541

    Red face Which tele? 55-300 Nikkor or pop for the 70-300 Nikkor...

    I have my D40 for sale and also my Nikkor 55-200VR lens so I hope to have some cash pretty soon. I will be replacing the 55-200VR with one of the lenses listed in the title, just not sure which one. So, tell me what you think and why should I spend the extra $100+ on the 70-300.

    This lens will mainly be used on my D90 but will bounce to my D3100 back up cam occasionally. Shots will be all types...

    Thanks guys!
    Nikon D90 & D5100
    Nikon 18-105 VR
    Nikon 35mm f/1.8
    Nikon 50mm f/1.8
    Nikon 55-200 VR
    Nikon 70-300 VR
    f/8 and be there...
    My Flickr

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kanagawa, Japan
    Posts
    267
    I had to make this choice for my D90 last September - ended up getting the 70-300 VR.

    Why? I didn't like the feel of the 55-300 when I compared it side-by-side in the camera store. The autofocus seemed slower and the lens wasn't as solid as the 70-300VR. It's also a DX only lens - not useful if I was to move up to an FX body (not that I have any plans to right now).

    I don't regret purchasing the 70-300 VR at all. Though a bit slow with a f/4.5 starting point, the lens takes awesome shots, particularly outdoors during daylight. The optics are fantastic - and I sheepishly admit to using it for close up shots (though I pooh-poohed that idea in a discussion of telephoto lenses somewhere in this discussion group).
    "No matter where you go, there you are."
    -Buckaroo Banzai


    Nikon D90 | Nikkor 18-105VR | AF Nikkor 50 f/1.4D | AF Micro Nikkor 105 | AF Nikkor 20 f/2.8D | AF Nikkor 70-300VR |
    Canon IXY 810IS | Canon UW Housing


    My Picasa Site

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    A large chunk of Gondwana
    Posts
    6,546
    I suspect that the 55-300 will replace the 55-200. I can't see any reason why they would have both lenses in the line up.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kanagawa, Japan
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by K1W1 View Post
    I suspect that the 55-300 will replace the 55-200. I can't see any reason why they would have both lenses in the line up.
    To get rid of a backlog of 55-200 lenses. :-D
    "No matter where you go, there you are."
    -Buckaroo Banzai


    Nikon D90 | Nikkor 18-105VR | AF Nikkor 50 f/1.4D | AF Micro Nikkor 105 | AF Nikkor 20 f/2.8D | AF Nikkor 70-300VR |
    Canon IXY 810IS | Canon UW Housing


    My Picasa Site

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    541
    I am 99.9% sure I will go with the 70-300. I think I will be happier with that than the 55-300.
    Nikon D90 & D5100
    Nikon 18-105 VR
    Nikon 35mm f/1.8
    Nikon 50mm f/1.8
    Nikon 55-200 VR
    Nikon 70-300 VR
    f/8 and be there...
    My Flickr

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Kanagawa, Japan
    Posts
    267
    Another incentive for the 70-300 is that in some places these were discounted by ~$50 by Nikon. Not sure if this is still the case in the US, but I notice that in Japan the 70-300 and some other lenses have a ¥5,000 discount.
    "No matter where you go, there you are."
    -Buckaroo Banzai


    Nikon D90 | Nikkor 18-105VR | AF Nikkor 50 f/1.4D | AF Micro Nikkor 105 | AF Nikkor 20 f/2.8D | AF Nikkor 70-300VR |
    Canon IXY 810IS | Canon UW Housing


    My Picasa Site

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Milwaukee, WI
    Posts
    295
    I havent read any reviews recently of the 55-300, but when it first came out I remember people saying it was almost exactly like the 55-200 in build quality and optical quality. As I said, that was the initial reviews of it, and since then people may have changed their mind.

    I'd suspect that you would be dissapointed in the 55-300 and would regret not getting the 70-300.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).