Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 44
  1. #31
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario
    Posts
    1,903
    Looks sweet. Does it AF?
    Canon EOS 7D

    flickr
    FLUIDR

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    Sure it AFs'.

    SonyNut, I don't know why you say consumers wouldn't want it, unless I've missed your point. That thing will fly off the shelves if it does what it says on the tin.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario
    Posts
    1,903
    If it were under 2k with a decent enough lens, I'd bite!
    But I'm thinking something like sub 5k by the looks of it...
    Canon EOS 7D

    flickr
    FLUIDR

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    It's not far off.
    $2000 including the $800 80-200mm stabilised lens.

    see here http://www.imaging-resource.com/PROD...0/NEXVG10A.HTM
    Last edited by Peekayoh; 07-14-2010 at 06:00 PM. Reason: got the sums wrong

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,760
    The film industry is eating it all up..but they want 24p ect...more money for mikon, canon and panasonic...thats right panasonic is kicking sonys ass


    THEY NEED A GOOD FULL FRAME 1080 24 P + MANUAL LINKED CONTROL OF THE IRIS .+..AND NOT WITH THEIR NEW MIMI MOUSE MOUNT

    and if they do the through the lens mirrorless view...they would have a winner
    Last edited by SONYNUT; 07-14-2010 at 06:22 PM.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    Well, you may be right, Sonynut. Not being a Video aficionado, I really wouldn't know.
    I'll bet this will satisfy a lot of people, maybe Wedding shooters for instance, and you can bet there will be other more advanced models to come.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,760
    What i'm wondering is why this is 1300 bucks more than the nex-5 ...it does the exact same thing........they added a microphone..big deal....not a 1300 mic.lol.

    The nex-5 would be a good camera for anyone that has an old md lens collection.(like me.lol)...or slap it on my telescope....hmmmmmmmmmmm

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    God's Country - Australia
    Posts
    10,424
    Quote Originally Posted by SONYNUT View Post
    What i'm wondering is why this is 1300 bucks more than the nex-5 ...it does the exact same thing........they added a microphone..big deal....not a 1300 mic.lol.
    obviously this is said tongue in cheek so i wont address it.
    i love where all of this is going to be honest. more creative options for people and more of a system approach. using the same lens' on your DVC and DSLR...freakin awesome.
    D800e l V3 l AW1 l 16-35 l 35 l 50 l 85 l 105 l EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75
    flickr

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,760
    obviously this is said tongue in cheek so i wont address it.


    it is?

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    God's Country - Australia
    Posts
    10,424
    Quote Originally Posted by SONYNUT View Post
    it is?
    one can only hope.
    D800e l V3 l AW1 l 16-35 l 35 l 50 l 85 l 105 l EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75
    flickr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •