Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    594

    Digital Rebel w/low light

    I am looking to buy this cam. but I am worried about low light shots!! anyone have any input on this?

    T.I.A.

    Tim

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Monterey Bay
    Posts
    5,487
    Quote Originally Posted by NewTekBuzz
    I am looking to buy this cam. but I am worried about low light shots!! anyone have any input on this?

    T.I.A.

    Tim
    With the capability to take relatively clean shots all the way to ISO 1600, and having the availability of zoom lenses offering f2.8 starting at around $380 (Sigma 24-70mm f2.8 EX Aspherical DG DF) and image stabilization in the $400 range (Canon EF 28-135mm f3.5-5.6 IS) low light should not be a limitation issue.

    There are reasons that most professional photographers use dSLR's...

    ...performance and options.
    D7000, D70, CP990, CP900, FE + a lens or 6.
    Ha! See, I can change...


    http://d70fan.smugmug.com/

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,175
    If you are taking shots of still objects in low light, then an IS lens is a cheaper and more appropriate solution. If you are talking more about taking pictures of action and sports, then you'll need a faster (f/2-2.8) lens.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    594
    The lenes I have now are from my 35mm EOS rebel II S, EF 35-80 1:4-5.6 & EF 75-300 1:4-5.6 are these any good? they are both canons. be honist!
    I have to say... I really dont know much about the different lenes aside from the zooming. So with digital there are no film speeds... 200 400 and so on. how do you set the camera up for the dif. lighting?
    could you please point me into the right direction for some reading on what the lens marking means?

    Thanks again, Tim

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    884
    I don't know of the quality as I don't use canon, but they are rather slow, plus the 35mm widest angle on a DSLR would give you just over 50mm so useless as a wide angle!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Monterey Bay
    Posts
    5,487
    Quote Originally Posted by NewTekBuzz
    The lenes I have now are from my 35mm EOS rebel II S, EF 35-80 1:4-5.6 & EF 75-300 1:4-5.6 are these any good? they are both canons. be honist!
    I have to say... I really dont know much about the different lenes aside from the zooming. So with digital there are no film speeds... 200 400 and so on. how do you set the camera up for the dif. lighting?
    could you please point me into the right direction for some reading on what the lens marking means?

    Thanks again, Tim
    You can use your old lenses on the DReb, but they will not allow you to shoot with a wide field of vision, as you must multiply the lens range by 1.6. So now the 35mm-80mm lens is equivelent to a 56mm-128mm lens. This is because the sensor is smaller than a 35mm film frame by that factor, so it is like cropping the 35mm negative. This is called the "crop factor".

    With digital there are "equivalent" film speeds and they represent the same sensitivity factor as film and even retain the ISO ratings of 100, 200, 400, 800, and 1600 (for example).

    The lens marking is relatively simple:

    The primary numbers represent the focal length, or range, on a fixed focus or zoom lens. 50mm is considered the "neutral point" which approximates what your eyes see. Below 50mm is considered wide angle and above is considered telephoto. So, for example, a 28mm lens is wide angle and a 105mm lens is telephoto.

    The f rating represents the amount of light the lens will allow to pass through the "aperture", controlled by a variable mechanical device that opens and closes according to required shutter speed and available light. So an aperture of f2.8 means the opening is wide allowing a lot of light in and f8 would be a smaller opening, allowing less light, but allowing a deeper focus distance called depth of field or DOF. At f2.8 the main subject would be in fine focus, but the background would be blurred (think of a portrait). At f8, and greater, more of the background would be in focus.

    This is just a quick explanation, so I would suggest a trip to the library and a book on basic photography. Digital cameras follow most of the same rules as film. Just keep in mind it is mostly light management and you will be ahead of the game.

    Hope this helps.
    D7000, D70, CP990, CP900, FE + a lens or 6.
    Ha! See, I can change...


    http://d70fan.smugmug.com/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    MI
    Posts
    594
    Thanks alot george. I will do some reading and catch you later

    thanks everyone!!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,099
    Quote Originally Posted by NewTekBuzz
    I am looking to buy this cam. but I am worried about low light shots!! anyone have any input on this?

    T.I.A.

    Tim
    The camera itself won't have problems with low light - it's a matter of what setting you choose in a particular shot. Adjust the shutter speed, aperture or ISO as appropriate.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,124
    Speaking out of experience, biggest issue with low light shots is time to focus not good exposure.

    The less avalible light = the greater the difficulty of focus for AF. 28-135 will focus it'll just take a LONG time (useless for "oh I want the picture now or moving people)

    A prime (non zoom lens) something like 50 mm F 1.8 is a PERFECT low light lens for about 75$, its fixed at 50 mm which is ~ 88 mm on your rebel but it focuses much faster and can take MUCH faster shutter speeds then a 28>135 3.5/4.5 lens.

    Tim

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,807
    Quote Originally Posted by NewTekBuzz
    I am looking to buy this cam. but I am worried about low light shots!! anyone have any input on this?

    T.I.A.

    Tim
    i'm not clear on whether you are refering to low-light focusing or low light shooting in general. in both cases the rebel is far beyond any non-dslr cam that i've tried (have not used the sony cams with their laser-grid AF lamps though). i've found low light shooting to be easiest with large aperture lenses. if you need a little more depth of field then Image Stabilization is quite useful. as for focusing in low light, the rebel focuses quite quickly without an AF assist lamp. if you do use the lamp, which is really the flash in "strobe mode," the light it emits is so bright that focusing quick and easy. it does have a bit of a problem focusing on fur(in dim light) and mirrored objects (in any lighting) though.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).