Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,680
    Quote Originally Posted by DWessel View Post
    So, in my book a person who spends a ton of money on a DSLR set up to use it like a P&S to take snap shots is an idiot for not learning and exploring the features of a DSLR that allow one to adjust (and hopefully improve) a shot.
    We are in agreement that the SLR will not necessarily make you a better photographer. We are also in agreement that an SLR will give you the capability of controlling the results of your shots.

    However, set up a P&S and an SLR side by side and take a shot with both cameras in full auto mode. The resulting shots will more than likely be totally different. The physics behind the lenses will inherently result in different depths of field. The aggressive sharpening techniques utilised in the P&S will sometimes result in a "perceived" sharper picture.

    Either way, the pictures will be different.

    For some, these differences are all they are after. A common request is how do I take a photo that shows the subject in focus while the background is blurred. You and I know that this is hard to achieve with a P&S...but can be easily achieved with an SLR. The same applies to action photography. P&S cameras struggle, SLR's "can" make it easy.

    If the purchase of an SLR enables a user to achieve these goals (by using the basic programme options....eg Full Auto Mode, Portrait Mode, Sports Mode etc), then surely that alone is enough justification for their purchase.

    Just because they show no interest in progressing further does not make them an idiot.

    And the good news is, they now have the capability to experiment further in the future if their needs/interests change.
    Last edited by Honest Gaza; 02-04-2010 at 05:05 PM.
    Canon 5D MKlll & Canon 50D
    Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 | Canon 430EX Flash | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Lowepro Toploader 65 AW | Lowepro Slingshot 200AW | Kata 3n1-10

    Panasonic Lumix FZ200
    Panasonic Lumix TZ7 (aka ZS3)
    Panasonic Lumix FT3 (aka TS3)

    Ali Baba.....the Thief of Bad Gags

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,759
    if you can get them to experiment...not just blame the lens they bought..saying they can't get a good picture because they refuse to listen..you can take crappy pictures with zeiss lenses at high iso too......

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    602
    Quote Originally Posted by SONYNUT View Post
    if you can get them to experiment...not just blame the lens they bought..saying they can't get a good picture because they refuse to listen..you can take crappy pictures with zeiss lenses at high iso too......
    Hey, here's an idea. When you come across someone like that, you offer to buy that "crappy" Zeiss lens from them for a steep discount, because you "might be able to fix it so it takes good pictures."
    Darin Wessel
    α 900
    Zooms: Tamron SP AF70-200mm f2.8 Di LD Macro; Sigma 28-90mm D macro, Konica-Minolta 18-70 f3.5-5.6
    Primes: Minolta 28mm f2.8; Sony 50mm f1.4
    Minolta RC-1000 remote commander

    Film:
    Calumet Cambo CC400 4x5 View Camera
    YashikaMat 6x6 TLR (other accessories)
    Minolta Maxxum 7000 w/ Minolta 35-80mm f/4-5.6 & Minolta 2800 flash
    Minolta Maxxum 5000i & Vivitar 728 AFM flash
    What's next???

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •