| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
 Originally Posted by neversaynever
I don't mean flat colors with "flat." After a bit of thinking, it's probably DOF that attracts me, as a film shooter back in the old days, 5d seems to replicate the exact "bokeh" and out of focus effect I loved on velvia film. ...
Honestly I've probably done as many comparisons between 1.6X crop and FF as anyone.
The main difference between FF and 1.6X crop is DOF/subject isolation at the same camera to subject distance.
Yes, the resolution is a little bettter in the center with FF and the noise is a little better, but its the DOF that you will really notice.
I can use f/4 zooms on FF and get really nice subject isolation.
And and at f/2.8 on FF things just get buttery....
f/2.8 on my "cheap" Sigma 105 macro....

5D, 85 1.8, f/2........vs..........vs 40D, 50 1.4, f/2....

5D, 105mm, f/2.8..............vs...........40D, 60mm, f/2.8...

40D, 100mm, f/4................vs..............5D, 149mm, f/4 (look at the subject isolation in the lower image - it changes the entire look of the photo)

This was shot at 200mm, f/4 on my 5D. To get this kind of subject isolation on my 40D I would have to use a lens capable of opening up to f/2.5 at the same distance from my subject....
Michael B.
Canon 5D2, 550D, Sony NEX 5N, Sigma 15mm fish, 24L mkI, 35L, 40mm f/2.8, 50 1.8 II, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 50mm f/2.8 macro, 60mm macro, 100mm f/2, 70-200 f/4, 200 f/2.8 mk I, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, 430EX. Growing list of MF lenses!
-
Oh, and Rooz, congrats on the D700.
Michael B.
Canon 5D2, 550D, Sony NEX 5N, Sigma 15mm fish, 24L mkI, 35L, 40mm f/2.8, 50 1.8 II, Sigma 50 1.4, Sigma 50mm f/2.8 macro, 60mm macro, 100mm f/2, 70-200 f/4, 200 f/2.8 mk I, Tamron 28-75 f/2.8, 430EX. Growing list of MF lenses!
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|