| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
 Originally Posted by ooverdrive
So what happens it reach the extreme. Can we replace a dead shutter!
Two days ago, they replaced my wife's knee. That's way harder than replacing a mechanical part on a camera. They actually had her on her feet yesterday morning (not that she went very far, no marathons yet).
So, to answer your question, piece of cake.
Eric Lund
Nikon D200
Nikkors: 17-55mm f2.8, 18-200mm f3.5-f4.5 VR, 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 VR, 35mm f2, 50mm f1.8, 55mm f2.8 AI-S micro, 105mm f2.8 VR micro
Other Lenses: Tokina 12-24 f4, Tamron 75-300mm f4-5.6 LD macro
Stuff: Nikon SB800, Nikon MBD200, Gitzo 1327 Tripod w/RRS BH-55LR Ballhead, Sekonic L-358 meter
-
 Originally Posted by erichlund
... piece of cake.
Technically not a challenge, but with bigger better cheaper bodies coming along on an annual basis, whether it would be economically desirable to do so on a consumer DSLR is highly questionable.
D300 | MB-D10
18-105MM F/3.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX VR | 105mm f/1.8 AI-S | 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G ED-IF AF-S VR | 80-200 f/2.8 | 50mm f1.4 | SB-900 | SB-600
-
So how much uneconomic on consumer bodies
Nikon D40,
Nikon TC 200
Vivitar 28-80 AIS
Nikon Micro 55mm AI 1977,
Nikon 50mm f/1.8 E AIS 1979,
Nikon 300mm f/4 ED IF AIS 1982.....
-
if you want to pay about $200, Nikon, Sony or Canon can replace your shutter for you.
-
We need to know what: confidence interval, standard deviation, and number in the test. One really important factor is that they ran every camera in the test to it's failure. In any case think about how these test were conducted, did the cameras get burned at 1:4000 second with endless power supply? If it can last for that long I trust it. Nikon makes great products and if you have a problem Nikon should stand behind it.
-
 Originally Posted by ooverdrive
So how much uneconomic on consumer bodies
Products built to last there expected life no built to last an infinite period.
Have you ever wondered why mobile phones all die when they are around two years old which just happens to be the typical contract length?
Same with cameras. Consumer level products are built to last a couple of years and that's all because the manufacturers know that consumers will be upgrading to the next or next plus one generation by that stage.
-
Yeah good ole built in obsolescence !
Cameras: Nikon D300, Panasonic Lumix G2, LX3 & FZ20
Nikkor Lenses: 24-70mm f2.8 - 70-300mm VRII f4.5-5.6 - 50mm f1.4 G - 35mm f1.8 G - 50mm f1.8 - 18-200mm VR f3.5-5.6
Other Lenses: Tokina: 11-16mm f2.8, Sigma: 17-70mm f2.8-4.5 Macro, Lumix: 14-42mm f3.5-5.6 & 20mm f1.7
Other: Nikon SB 600, Vivitar 1/2/4 Close-up Lens, Cokin Graduated ND Filter and more...
Computers/Software: MacBookPro 2.8ghz, Dell Latitude D630, Lexar CF UDMA FW800 Reader, Nikon Capture NX 1+2, Adobe Lightroom 1+2+3
-
 Originally Posted by K1W1
Products built to last there expected life no built to last an infinite period.
Have you ever wondered why mobile phones all die when they are around two years old which just happens to be the typical contract length?
.
Shit, I'm doing good to get 12 months out of one, in fact that's never happened.
Stephen: Another kiwi bumming around Aussie welding shit up missing home....
Bloggy thing
-
mine is around 16004 (by "Around" I mean "precisely" according to Opanda)...
Hmmm...that is not that much! Better get HDRing...
Funny quote from a british magazine on HDR:
"One guy had his DSLR permanently set to autobracketing so he could HDR every scene. Whenever he hit the shutter button, it felt like we were under enemy attack and I kept looking for places to hide..."
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
Home | News | Digital
Camera Reviews & Info | Forums | Buyers
Guide | Digital Camera Prices | FAQ | About | Advertising | Feedback
All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
|
|
|
|