Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Nikon D400?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    6

    Nikon D400?

    I'm almost certain this has been discussed before, but I'll give it a re-hash.

    No, I wouldn't be in the market for a D400. What I want to know is whether or not a new Nikon semi-pro will probably be introduced this year, thus driving down prices on the D300, my ideal camera. I do know that the D40/60 are due for an update and the consumer market will be Nikon's priority, but it seems that the time is also ripe for a new DX flagship to complete the high-end product blitz. Is this true?
    HAVE: D40 50mm f/1.8 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 70-300mm f/4-5.6 SB-400

    WANT: D300 14-24mm f/2.8

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    God's Country - Australia
    Posts
    10,424
    the d300 is already the DX flagship, is only just over 12 months old and is the best DX camera on the market right now by a decent margin so i dont think the "time is ripe" at all. i wouldnt be banking on it coming any earlier than late this year.

    of course things change and with PMA around the corner and the global crisis, no one really knows wtf is gonna happen.
    D800e l V3 l AW1 l 16-35 l 35 l 50 l 85 l 105 l EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75
    flickr

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,931
    Quote Originally Posted by Rooz View Post
    the d300 is already the DX flagship, is only just over 12 months old
    It was actually released by Nikon in August 2007 so it's already around 18 months into the typical 2 year life cycle. I'm sure that there will be a replacement for the D300 released in 2009 the only issue will be when.

    Of course the new camera will be priced in line with the currency exchange rates today rather than what they were when the D300 was released so if anything it may push D300 prices UP rather than down due to the fact it is likely to be considerably more expensive at MSRP. If nothing else Nikon will push the MSRP up as much as they possibly can based on the camera being a premium product rather than a mass market one. They will want to make money out of the camera to cover losses at the lower end consumer D40/60 market.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Northern Colorado, USA
    Posts
    2,225
    I think that Thom Hogan is thinking more Autumn/Christmas for a D300 replacement. That would put it on the typical two year cycle.
    Eric Lund
    Nikon D200
    Nikkors: 17-55mm f2.8, 18-200mm f3.5-f4.5 VR, 70-300mm f4.5-5.6 VR, 35mm f2, 50mm f1.8, 55mm f2.8 AI-S micro, 105mm f2.8 VR micro
    Other Lenses: Tokina 12-24 f4, Tamron 75-300mm f4-5.6 LD macro
    Stuff: Nikon SB800, Nikon MBD200, Gitzo 1327 Tripod w/RRS BH-55LR Ballhead, Sekonic L-358 meter

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Monterey Bay
    Posts
    6,029
    A quick comment: Except for Japan (Yen) the exchange rate of other currencies, in this case the Thai Baht (primary manufacturing for Nikon), has lost ground to the dollar. If the cameras were manufactured in Japan, then we would see some price inflation.

    For reference, here is the latest 120 day graph (Baht to Dollar exchange rate).
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by D70FAN; 02-08-2009 at 07:56 AM.
    D7000, D70, CP990, CP900, FE.
    50mm f/1.8, Sigma 18-125, Sigma 24-70 f/2.8, Nikon 18-105 VR, Nikon 55-200 VR, Nikon 43-86 f/3.5 AiS, Vivitar 28-90 F/2.8-3.5 Macro, Vivitar 75-205 F/3.8-4.8, SB800.
    Ha! See, I can change...


    http://d70fan.smugmug.com/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •