Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 48 of 337 FirstFirst ... 3846474849505898148 ... LastLast
Results 471 to 480 of 3363
  1. #471
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,562
    Nice images
    Frank
    Sony A77
    Sony A580
    Sony A 100
    Maxxum 400si.
    Sony 18-70 Kit Lens
    Minolta AF 35-70
    Minolta AF 50 f/1.7
    Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 Di LD
    Tamron 60mm Macro
    Tamron 17-50 f/2.8
    Tamron 2x Converter
    Sony HVL-F42AM
    Quantaray 70-300 4.5-5.6 Macro
    Slingshot 200 Bag



    http://www.flickr.com/photos/22083244@N06/

    http://s305.photobucket.com/albums/nn219/sparkie1263/

  2. #472
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ohio, USA.
    Posts
    1,161
    From Wrestling meet, lots of bokeh, maybe to much? Shot with out flash indoors under less then great lighting.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Sony A700_____________Minolta AF 50mm. F/1.7
    Minolta AF 70-210mm F/3.5-4.5 Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR DiII LD Asp. [IF]
    Tamron SP AF 70-200mm. F/2.8 DI LD [IF] Macro
    Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2
    Tokina AF 28-70mm F/3.5-4.5
    Tokina AF AT-X 80-400mm F/4.5-5.6
    http://flickr.com/

  3. #473
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    Thanks, Frank.
    Sean, didn't know you could have too much Bokeh! Does it hurt?

  4. #474
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    2,204
    You can never have too much bokeh!
    flickr

    Canon 7D - 5D | 550EX - 430EX II - (2) PW FlexTT5 | 24-105 f4L | 70-200 f2.8L IS | 100 f2.8L IS | 50 f1.8 II

  5. #475
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ohio, USA.
    Posts
    1,161
    Well it tingles more then it hurts....... LOL I thought maybe it was to um blotchy? not as silky creamy bokeh as I have seen in othe photos, but still cool.
    Sony A700_____________Minolta AF 50mm. F/1.7
    Minolta AF 70-210mm F/3.5-4.5 Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR DiII LD Asp. [IF]
    Tamron SP AF 70-200mm. F/2.8 DI LD [IF] Macro
    Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2
    Tokina AF 28-70mm F/3.5-4.5
    Tokina AF AT-X 80-400mm F/4.5-5.6
    http://flickr.com/

  6. #476
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario
    Posts
    1,903
    yeah it is not creamy but still looks good. i'm sure you can use some Gaussian Blur to make it look more appealing.
    Canon EOS 7D

    flickrо
    FLUIDR

  7. #477
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ohio, USA.
    Posts
    1,161
    Thanks Elisha, I still had the ISO jacked up to like 2500 maybe even 3200 when I shot it, I wonder if I had backed it down if that would have 'smoothed' the bokeh a bit?
    Sony A700_____________Minolta AF 50mm. F/1.7
    Minolta AF 70-210mm F/3.5-4.5 Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR DiII LD Asp. [IF]
    Tamron SP AF 70-200mm. F/2.8 DI LD [IF] Macro
    Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2
    Tokina AF 28-70mm F/3.5-4.5
    Tokina AF AT-X 80-400mm F/4.5-5.6
    http://flickr.com/

  8. #478
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Guelph, Ontario
    Posts
    1,903
    this was a RAW convert right?
    what program do you use for RAW? Sony IDC?
    also does high ISO NR on/off have any affect on RAW?
    Canon EOS 7D

    flickrо
    FLUIDR

  9. #479
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ohio, USA.
    Posts
    1,161
    So far all my sports shooting has been in extra fine JPEG, then some cropping, and often just 'auto correct' on some that I really like I do a bit more work. I have got to make the effort I have elements 6 and lightroom 2 both loaded on the computer and just sitting there! I don't know if it's lazy, or fear of trying to learn something else new while still trying to learn what the camera can do, or what!
    Sony A700_____________Minolta AF 50mm. F/1.7
    Minolta AF 70-210mm F/3.5-4.5 Tamron AF 17-50mm F/2.8 XR DiII LD Asp. [IF]
    Tamron SP AF 70-200mm. F/2.8 DI LD [IF] Macro
    Tamron AF 70-300mm F/4-5.6 Di LD Macro 1:2
    Tokina AF 28-70mm F/3.5-4.5
    Tokina AF AT-X 80-400mm F/4.5-5.6
    http://flickr.com/

  10. #480
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    Quote Originally Posted by seanhoxx View Post
    Thanks Elisha, I still had the ISO jacked up to like 2500 maybe even 3200 when I shot it, I wonder if I had backed it down if that would have 'smoothed' the bokeh a bit?
    The short answer is "No".
    If you'd backed down on the ISO, you'd have needed to decrease the shutter speed which doesn't affect DOF.
    Theoretically you could have increased the aperture instead which would affect the DOF and therefore the Bokeh, however you were already at f2.8 so that's a non starter.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •