Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 285 of 337 FirstFirst ... 185235275283284285286287295335 ... LastLast
Results 2,841 to 2,850 of 3363
  1. #2841
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    2,562
    Looks like Iso 100.
    Frank

    Sony A77
    Sony A580
    Sony A 100
    Maxxum 400si.
    Sony 18-70 Kit Lens
    Minolta AF 35-70
    Minolta AF 50 f/1.7
    Tamron 70-300 f/4-5.6 Di LD
    Tamron 60mm Macro
    Tamron 17-50 f/2.8
    Tamron 2x Converter
    Sony HVL-F42AM
    Quantaray 70-300 4.5-5.6 Macro
    Slingshot 200 Bag



    http://www.flickr.com/photos/22083244@N06/

    http://s305.photobucket.com/albums/nn219/sparkie1263/

  2. #2842
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,759
    THE FLAKES ARE OUT TONIGHT!
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #2843
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,759
    hopefully he won't let us go broke......
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #2844
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    34
    This photo was taken in Kings Park (Perth Western Australia) with the following settings:

    Sony A55
    Sigma 10-20mm
    f/22
    ISO100
    22 sec

    Last edited by Buck Nasty; 01-23-2011 at 03:22 AM.

  5. #2845
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,759
    poor tree has no arms

  6. #2846
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    34
    Yeh unfortunately the old girl had to be trimmed up before transportation - moved from the "outback" into the city.

    Summer dayze

    City Beach (again in Perth) on a typical stinking hot day between Christmas and New Years.

    Sony A55
    Sigma 10-20mm
    ISO100
    f22
    25 sec

    Last edited by Buck Nasty; 01-23-2011 at 03:24 AM.

  7. #2847
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,759
    nice...............

  8. #2848
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    +1

    Which 10mm were you using? Please include exif with post.
    Also f22 not really recommended with APS-C due to diffraction.


    "So if we could, let's have a few simple guidelines:
    One picture per person per day max.
    Every picture must be different.
    EXIF Info (including lens used).
    Comments/caption on the shot.

  9. #2849
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    34
    Sorry guys, I didn't read this thread properly before posting. I've gone back and edited my last 3 photos just to give a run down of what I did and where they were taken.

    Peekayoh, I like the deep colours you get in the sky at that time of afternoon/night, I've found through trial and error the only way I can tranfer that into a photo is with a long exposure, but using anything between f5.6-f11 means I can only do a 1-5 sec shot at best which isn't long enough, so winding the aperture out to f22 I can do the 20-30 sec exposures which gives me the colours I want.

  10. #2850
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Monmouthshire, UK
    Posts
    2,152
    Apology not necessary but acceptable.
    Welcome to the Forum BTW.

    Longer exposure for saturation used to be a consideration with film and was, I guess, a function of the way the emulsion was layered and the chemical actions that took place. Reciprocity failure was also a factor.

    I don't believe these things are relevant with digital, rather that correct exposure and White Balance play a bigger role.
    If it were me I'd be shooting at f8/f11 to get rid of diffraction and find an exposure/WB that gave me what I was after.
    Also, whilst a very long exposure can help achieve a particular effect, say to smooth the water, it will also blur anything that moves.
    The shorter exposure would make bracketing easier too.

    Still, if your method works for you, that's what counts.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •