| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
Number of photos on an 8gb CF card?
I'm sorry... this has got to have been addressed before, but I can't find it.
I'm going to be traveling through South America for almost 4 weeks coming up in November. I want to take advantage of the good rebates at SanDisk and get enough memory for the trip.
If a person decides to shoot in RAW *and* JPEG combined, how many photos from a 10 megapixel 40D would fit on one of these 8gb Extreme III CF cards? Not that I intend to use that method the whole time, but maybe I will. I don't know.
Addendum: Another question... mostly curiosity. When you review your pics and decide to delete some, does one action delete both the RAW file and the JPEG file, if you choose to shoot in duplicate like that?
Last edited by Idnas71; 07-30-2008 at 11:30 AM.
-
I shoot RAW only on my 10mp XTI, and it produces files between 8 and 10 mb, so I get about 400 on my 4gb card. I would suspect that a jpg would add about 1-2mb per pic or so....
Do you have the 40D already? You could just try it out on a smaller card to see what you get...
My best pics on Flickr
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/garysimmons
Like me on Facebook: facebook.com/GarySimmonsPhotography
Gear: Canon 60D, Sigma 18-50 f2.8 EX DC Macro, Sigma 50-150 f2.8 EX DC II, Canon 50 f1.8, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC, Sigma 120-400 DG OS. 1 430EX, 1 430EXII, 1 580EXII, ST-E2, Manfrotto 190XPROB (soon to be replaced by the carbon version)
Plus filters, wireless triggers and other junk...
-
The camera reviews on this site tell you approximate file sizes at the various quality settings. You should be able to figure it out from that.
Lukas
Camera: Anonymous
I could tell you but I wouldn't want you to get all pissy if it's the wrong brand
Flickr
500px
My Website
-
Thanks, GaryS. No, I don't have the 40D yet... it's on the slow shipping truck... probably another week before I see it. I could certainly wait and test it for myself, as you suggested.
-
I'd say that you'd be better off in this instance with a lot more CF cards. I went for 6 weeks to the Baltics and took 1,500 photos - that's an average of about 40 photos a day and it's somewhere that I'd been many times before. I'd say you should be thinking in terms of 200 photos a day or 5,600 photos total. In RAW on a 40D this is 12.4mb/image or about 70GB. That's several 8GB cards or pray and hope it works and get a portable hard drive. Just don't use the hard drive above 10,000 feet.
-
When on vacation, I tend to shoot about 400-500 images a week.
My best pics on Flickr
Follow me on Twitter: twitter.com/garysimmons
Like me on Facebook: facebook.com/GarySimmonsPhotography
Gear: Canon 60D, Sigma 18-50 f2.8 EX DC Macro, Sigma 50-150 f2.8 EX DC II, Canon 50 f1.8, Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6 EX DC, Sigma 120-400 DG OS. 1 430EX, 1 430EXII, 1 580EXII, ST-E2, Manfrotto 190XPROB (soon to be replaced by the carbon version)
Plus filters, wireless triggers and other junk...
-
 Originally Posted by Rhys
Just don't use the hard drive above 10,000 feet.
My Epson P5000 (viewer with hard drive) worked fine hiking around Tibet...average height around 14,000 feet...
Some Gear: Nikon D700; Nikkor AF-S 50 f/1.4 G; Nikkor AF-S 24-85 3.f/5-4.5 G ED; Tamron 28-300 f/3.5-6.3 VC; Nikon SB-800; Velbon Maxi-F; Canon Pixma Pro 9000; Canon S3IS, Canon SD500; Epson 4990; Epson P5000; Wacom Intuos 3
Main Software: Capture NX2; Adobe PhotoShop CS2; Corel Paintshop Pro X2 Ultimate
Sold: Canon XT/350D, EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS, EF 100mm f/2.8 Macro; EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5, Sigma 18-200 OS; Canon ET EF 25II; Kenko Pro 300 DG, Canon 430EX, Canon BG-E3.
-
Thank you for the replies. I just bought three of the Sandisk Extreme III 8gb CF cards and will take advantage of the full $160 rebate. I figure with reviewing my photos in the evenings and ditching the bad ones (there are usually a bunch of those), that should be sufficient for me. Part of the trip is a cruise, and I imagine the days at sea will not provide much photo-taking opportunity. When we hit the Chilean fjords, though, I'm looking forward to some great on-ship scenery.
I'm not sure of the elevation at Machu Picchu... I know it's high, though. I'm not taking the laptop, just the camera stuff.
Last edited by Idnas71; 07-30-2008 at 01:48 PM.
-
Machu Picchu is rougly 7800', lower then Cusco which is 11,000'. There was a problem with CF II hard drives where they would sometimes fail over 10,000'. Since at the time they were the biggest memory cards available it was a big deal. I don't know if the same holds for current drives used in compact storage devices (like iPod disks).
-
I'm not sure of the elevation at Machu Picchu... I know it's high, though. I'm not taking the laptop, just the camera stuff.
That will be a great visit - hope they do not close it soon due to damage caused by...too many tourists...
Pentax K20D/K5/15/21/40/70/10-17/12-24, Sigma 17-70 2.8-4.5/150-500, Tamron 90 Macro/70-200 2.8, Canon SX20 IS/Elph 500HS
(formerly Pentax 50 1.4/50-200/55-300/K100D, Sigma 18-50 2.8/70-300 APO, Tamron 28-75, Viv 800, Tele-Tokina 800, Canon S3 IS, Samsung L210)
http://s133.photobucket.com/albums/q78/KylePix/
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
Home | News | Digital
Camera Reviews & Info | Forums | Buyers
Guide | Digital Camera Prices | FAQ | About | Advertising | Feedback
All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
|
|
|
|