Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: F/64???

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    2,251
    Quote Originally Posted by jamison55 View Post
    I have a lens that goes down to f64: http://www.loreo.com/pages/products/loreo_lenscap.html

    A total waste of money!
    What an odd product!
    Adam
    -------------
    Canon 60D & lenses & flashes & stuff
    A bunch of cheap vintage film cameras


    My Etsy store

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    3,109
    'da bomb! http://www.loreo.com/pages/products/loreo_3dcap.html
    From the caption of one of the photos in the sample photo gallery: "It looks like a River, but is really a place where mosquitoes breed!"
    Canon A720 IS, 40D w/ BG-E2N, 28 1.8, 50 1.4, Sigma 70 2.8 macro, 17-40 F4 L, 24-105 F4 L IS, 70-200 F4 L IS, 430 EX, Kenko 2X TC & Ext Tubes, AB strobes and more...
    View my photo galleries here: imageevent.com/24peter

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Formerly South Wales. Now South Carolina.
    Posts
    7,147
    Many large format cameras - 5x7s, 10x8s etc have f64. Smaller cameras do not. The f-stop is related to the overall size of the lens elements and varies with the lens.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Formerly South Wales. Now South Carolina.
    Posts
    7,147
    Quote Originally Posted by AdamW View Post
    What an odd product!
    Given that a body cap costs $10 from Ritz and would take maybe 5 minutes to make a pinhole through with a hammer and a pin or fine nail, it seems a bit excessive to spend $15 plus $4 postage for what appears to be exactly the same thing. The stereo device looks interesting though. I believe Pentax makes a better model though (or at least they did in 35mm days.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Crapville, Australia
    Posts
    5,148
    Yeah Large Format as said before. When f/5.6 is wide open it brings a new meaning to 'stopping down'.
    Christian Wright; Dip Phot
    EOS 5D Mark III | EOS 600D | EOS-1V HS
    L: 14/2.8 II | 24/1.4 II | 35/1.4 | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 400/2.8 IS | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-105/4 IS | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS
    580EX II | EF 12 II | EF 25 II

  6. #16
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,651
    Quote Originally Posted by 24Peter View Post
    'da bomb! http://www.loreo.com/pages/products/loreo_3dcap.html
    From the caption of one of the photos in the sample photo gallery: "It looks like a River, but is really a place where mosquitoes breed!"
    LOL! That looks like a fun gimmick item

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Formerly South Wales. Now South Carolina.
    Posts
    7,147
    I wonder whether I could sell a generic body cap with a hole drilled for cost plus $5 plus postage - lol

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    113
    Quote Originally Posted by Prospero View Post
    I am not entirely sure about this, so perhaps somebody will correct me, but I think that the displayed f/stop is not the real f/stop in this case. So, while the camera may display f/57, you are still shooting at f/32.

    When you focus a macro lens to 1:1, you will lose some light. Nikon cameras compensate for this loss of light by displaying an equivalent f/stop. This can be quite handy when shooting manually, as the aperture displayed is the one you can use for determining the shutter speed and flash output (there's no need to worry about the light loss compared to shooting at normal focussing distances).
    My understanding is that Nikon cameras show the effective aperture (meaning magnification is accounted for) when using macro lenses and Canon cameras do not. Therefore your lens could be set to f/32 and the camera will adjust that as you approach 1:1.

    As far as minimum aperture goes, my wife's Sigma EX 50mm f/2.8 Macro goes down to f/45 if I recall correctly. Not that I would ever use any lens past ~f/16 in most cases. :P
    Canon EOS 40D | Pro1 | EOS 630 (film) | S2 IS | G1
    EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 | EF 50mm f/1.4 | EF 70-200 f/4 L | 580EX II

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    529
    Some old school lenses can get down to f/64
    | Canon 7D| Canon 5D|Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L IS USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS| Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 | Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II |
    my photos on flickr

  10. #20
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    1,651
    LOL !!! ... found this on eBay.

    f/150 Pancake Lens



    Horrible sample pics in the eBay page: http://cgi.ebay.com/Skink-Pinhole-Pa...QQcmdZViewItem


    Quote Originally Posted by Rhys View Post
    Given that a body cap costs $10 from Ritz and would take maybe 5 minutes to make a pinhole through with a hammer and a pin or fine nail, it seems a bit excessive to spend $15 plus $4 postage for what appears to be exactly the same thing. The stereo device looks interesting though. I believe Pentax makes a better model though (or at least they did in 35mm days.
    Someone heard you

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).