Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 10 of 31

Threaded View

  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Des Plaines, IL
    Posts
    9,559

    Post SIG vs Tok vs TAM

    Okay ... 20mm showdown at 1-foot (minimum focusing distance for the Tokina AF 20-35mm f/3.5-4.5)

    Okay ... all lenses set to an indicated 20mm, aperture set to f/5.6 and the lens swapped on a tripod mounted α700. Each lens was autofocused, several times, to remove any doubt.

    Ready ... GO!

    Tokina 20-35mm (age before beauty) 100% crop
    Name:  Tok-20-35mm-20mm-f56.jpg
Views: 298
Size:  69.0 KB

    SIGMA 10-20mm (our competing entry) 100% crop
    Name:  SIG-10-20mm-20mm-f56.jpg
Views: 300
Size:  74.6 KB

    TAMRON 17-50mm (staunch performer) 100% crop
    Name:  TAM-17-50mm-20mm-f56.jpg
Views: 294
Size:  82.5 KB


    Well, it's pretty clear that at 20mm, the SIGMA slightly outperformed the Tokina ... the image just looks better, clearer. The TAMRON ... as you can see ... just ran away with it. <Shrug> I know what I'm using for a 20mm shot. That contest is a no-brainer.

    I guess, to be honest, I expected just a little better performance out of the SIGMA, especially at the "far end." I mean, this was the Tokina's "widest-end", so what can you expect? TACK SHARP ... it ain't.

    Whatever!

    Still have yet to do distortion. Now, where are those goal posts?
    Last edited by DonSchap; 01-23-2008 at 08:31 PM.
    Don Schap - BFA, Digital Photography
    A Photographer Is Forever
    Look, I did not create the optical laws of the Universe ... I simply learned to deal with them.
    Remember: It is usually the GLASS, not the camera (except for moving to Full Frame), that gives you the most improvement in your photography.

    flickr & Sdi

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •