yeah the revews are coming in now. popphoto has theirs up including giving the d300 one of those camera of the year jobbies. camera labs has also posted their review. the only one left worthwhile reading is the dpreview version.
kiwi...ohhhhh kiwiiiiiiiii
D800e l D60 IR l 16-35 f4 l 24-120 f4 l 24G l 50G l 60G l 85G l 105VR l 300VR lXE-1 l 18R l 35R flickr
Chardog, your 30D is just fine. In fact, its a great camera and there is nothing sucky about it. I have seen great images from Xti's and 30D's in the hands of great photographers. The grass always seems greener on the other side... but you know what... it's really not!
yeah the revews are coming in now. popphoto has theirs up including giving the d300 one of those camera of the year jobbies. camera labs has also posted their review. the only one left worthwhile reading is the dpreview version.
kiwi...ohhhhh kiwiiiiiiiii
seeing camerlabs comparisons they think 5D (being much older camera) still beats D300 in ISO tests??? and they also menton they expect successor to 5D in early 2008!!! http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Ni.../verdict.shtml
seeing camerlabs comparisons they think 5D (being much older camera) still beats D300 in ISO tests??? and they also menton they expect successor to 5D in early 2008!!! http://www.cameralabs.com/reviews/Ni.../verdict.shtml
I tend to agree with Thom on this issue. Are these comparisons actually using signal to noise ratios as objective primary endpoints? Many do not and just feed the Canon vs. Nikon debate. A D200, D300, 5D, soon to be 6D will all take great pictures. The newer generation of cameras will have a definite advantage over the older generation depending on what you shoot and what is most important to you.