| |
 |
|
| |
|
-
 Originally Posted by tim11
Jason...
Pity Panasonic can't recreate the enthusiasm cause by the release of the FZ20...
Aint that the truth! That sure is/was a beauty. I may buy one again someday if I can find a decent one!
Looks like youre already enjoying the DSLR world... dont look back
Jason
"A coward dies a thousand deaths, a soldier dies but once."-2Pac
A bunch of Nikon stuff!
-
Way to go Tim.....now the money spending really begins
Canon 5D MKlll & Canon 50D
Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 | Soligor x 1.7 TC | E-Bay 50D Battery Grip | Canon 430EX Flash | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Lowepro Toploader 65 AW | Lowepro Slingshot 200AW | Kata 3n1-10
Panasonic Lumix TZ7 (aka ZS3)
Panasonic Lumix FT3 (aka TS3)
Ali Baba.....the Thief of Bad Gags
-
 Originally Posted by tim11
RAW is amazing!!!!!!!
I know... once I get better with RAW conversion, I might be able to get much better result but this was a quick job but had it been JPG format it would have been for the RECYCLE BIN.
ISO800, F/2.8, 1/15sec. RAW
If you had waited a while you could have spent a lot more money and purchased a D300 and taken that photo at ISO6400 or you could have spent a small fortune on a 70-200 f2.8VR and taken that photo from 70 feet away! 
Congratulations.
P.s. How did you get four kids to sit still enough for a 1/15 sec portrait?
-
 Originally Posted by Honest Gaza
Way to go Tim.....now the money spending really begins 
Don't worry GAZA. I won't go overboard though... The good thing about me getting into DSLR is I'm unlikely to buy a camera every year anymore; but the bad thing is I'm very likely to buy a lens or some other gear more than once a year. And as you know each item will cost more than a compact camera.
Last edited by tim11; 09-30-2007 at 06:41 AM.
Nikon D90, D80
Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) macro, Nikkor 50mm F/1.4D, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, Sigma 105mm F/2.8 EX DG Macro ||| 2x SB800 | SB600 ||| Manfrotto 190XB
-
 Originally Posted by K1W1
If you had waited a while you could have spent a lot more money and purchased a D300 and taken that photo at ISO6400 or you could have spent a small fortune on a 70-200 f2.8VR and taken that photo from 70 feet away!
Congratulations.
P.s. How did you get four kids to sit still enough for a 1/15 sec portrait?
K1W1: I knew about the release of D300 and its high ISO capability but I was never in second thought about it, knowing it will be well over my budget. Just consider the D200 costs well over $2000 body only and D300 won't be any cheaper. I have SB800 in my list so D300 will make me lazy about learning to use the flash effectively.
The 4 plastic faced kids? The trick is to make them watch some weird British children show. LOL.
Nikon D90, D80
Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) macro, Nikkor 50mm F/1.4D, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, Sigma 105mm F/2.8 EX DG Macro ||| 2x SB800 | SB600 ||| Manfrotto 190XB
-
 Originally Posted by tim11
The 4 plastic faced kids? The trick is to make them watch some weird British children show. LOL.
That is the punishment we use on our kids too!
- Rich
Nikon: D50, 18-70mm, 50mm, 70-200vr
Kenko: 12mm, 20mm, 36mm Ext Tubes
Manfrotto: 486RC2
Benro: A-327 tripod
My Flickr Photos Here
-
Tim, out of curiosity, why the Sigma 18-200mm OS, over the Nikkor version? I don't think the Sigma is likely to perform better, and isn't really much cheaper.
Nikon D40 + kit lens
Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 D AF(...or not)
-
 Originally Posted by fionndruinne
Tim, out of curiosity, why the Sigma 18-200mm OS, over the Nikkor version? I don't think the Sigma is likely to perform better, and isn't really much cheaper.
I play with the idea of getting the Nikkor but it still means over $300 difference.
Nikon D90, D80
Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) macro, Nikkor 50mm F/1.4D, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, Sigma 105mm F/2.8 EX DG Macro ||| 2x SB800 | SB600 ||| Manfrotto 190XB
-
I didn't think the difference was that big. When the Sigma was announced, its MSRP was higher than Nikon's, and they were almost the same price on the street. Now, it seems that the Sigma's street price is much lower than list, as tends to happen with half of their lenses.
Nikon: D300, D700, Nikkor: 24-70, 70-200, 70-300/VR, 24/2.8, 35/2, 50/1.4G, 60/2.8G, 180/2.8,
Sigma: 10-20, 50-150/2.8, 50/2.8, Tamron: 17-50/2.8, 28-75/2.8, Tokina: 12-24, Zeiss: 25/2.8
Olympus: E-520, E-3, 7-14, 9-18, 11-22, 12-60, 14-35/2, 14-54, 35-100/2, 50-200, 25/2.8, 35/3.5, 50/2
Panasonic: G1, Leica: 14-50, 14-150, 25/1.4
Sony: A700, A900, 24-85, 35-70, 70-210/4, 20/2.8, 24/2.8, 50/2.8, T 90 macro, Zeiss: 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8
P&S: Canon S90, Panasonic: LX3
-
have i missed something ? why are you looking at an 18-200 lens which won;t give you near the quality of the 18-50 sigma ? especially for that kinda money, those funds can be put to far better use elsewhere. an 80-200 f2.8 af-d, 50-150 sigma f2.8, macro lens, wide angle etc etc
D800e l D60 IR l 16-35 f4 l 24-120 f4 l 24G l 50G l 60G l 85G l 105VR l 300VR l XE-1 l 18R l 35R
flickr
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
Home | News | Digital
Camera Reviews & Info | Forums | Buyers
Guide | Digital Camera Prices | FAQ | About | Advertising | Feedback
All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).
|
|
|
|