Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 57
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Wisconsin
    Posts
    2,925
    Quote Originally Posted by tim11 View Post

    Jason...
    Pity Panasonic can't recreate the enthusiasm cause by the release of the FZ20...
    Aint that the truth! That sure is/was a beauty. I may buy one again someday if I can find a decent one!

    Looks like youre already enjoying the DSLR world... dont look back
    Jason

    "A coward dies a thousand deaths, a soldier dies but once."-2Pac


    A bunch of Nikon stuff!

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,675
    Way to go Tim.....now the money spending really begins
    Canon 5D MKlll & Canon 50D
    Canon 70-200mm f/2.8L USM | Canon EF-S 17-55mm f/2.8 IS USM | Canon EF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM | Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro | Canon 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM | Canon 50mm f/1.8 | Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 | Soligor x 1.7 TC | E-Bay 50D Battery Grip | Canon 430EX Flash | Lowepro Mini Trekker AW | Lowepro Toploader 65 AW | Lowepro Slingshot 200AW | Kata 3n1-10

    Panasonic Lumix TZ7 (aka ZS3)

    Panasonic Lumix FT3 (aka TS3)

    Ali Baba.....the Thief of Bad Gags

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    A large chunk of Gondwana
    Posts
    6,546
    Quote Originally Posted by tim11 View Post
    RAW is amazing!!!!!!!
    I know... once I get better with RAW conversion, I might be able to get much better result but this was a quick job but had it been JPG format it would have been for the RECYCLE BIN.
    ISO800, F/2.8, 1/15sec. RAW
    If you had waited a while you could have spent a lot more money and purchased a D300 and taken that photo at ISO6400 or you could have spent a small fortune on a 70-200 f2.8VR and taken that photo from 70 feet away!

    Congratulations.

    P.s. How did you get four kids to sit still enough for a 1/15 sec portrait?

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    4,222
    Quote Originally Posted by Honest Gaza View Post
    Way to go Tim.....now the money spending really begins
    Don't worry GAZA. I won't go overboard though... The good thing about me getting into DSLR is I'm unlikely to buy a camera every year anymore; but the bad thing is I'm very likely to buy a lens or some other gear more than once a year. And as you know each item will cost more than a compact camera.
    Last edited by tim11; 09-30-2007 at 06:41 AM.
    Nikon D90, D80
    Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) macro, Nikkor 50mm F/1.4D, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, Sigma 105mm F/2.8 EX DG Macro ||| 2x SB800 | SB600 ||| Manfrotto 190XB

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    4,222
    Quote Originally Posted by K1W1 View Post
    If you had waited a while you could have spent a lot more money and purchased a D300 and taken that photo at ISO6400 or you could have spent a small fortune on a 70-200 f2.8VR and taken that photo from 70 feet away!

    Congratulations.

    P.s. How did you get four kids to sit still enough for a 1/15 sec portrait?
    K1W1: I knew about the release of D300 and its high ISO capability but I was never in second thought about it, knowing it will be well over my budget. Just consider the D200 costs well over $2000 body only and D300 won't be any cheaper. I have SB800 in my list so D300 will make me lazy about learning to use the flash effectively.

    The 4 plastic faced kids? The trick is to make them watch some weird British children show. LOL.
    Nikon D90, D80
    Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) macro, Nikkor 50mm F/1.4D, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, Sigma 105mm F/2.8 EX DG Macro ||| 2x SB800 | SB600 ||| Manfrotto 190XB

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Maryland's Eastern Shore
    Posts
    2,143
    Quote Originally Posted by tim11 View Post
    The 4 plastic faced kids? The trick is to make them watch some weird British children show. LOL.
    That is the punishment we use on our kids too!
    - Rich

    Nikon: D50, 18-70mm, 50mm, 70-200vr
    Kenko: 12mm, 20mm, 36mm Ext Tubes
    Manfrotto: 486RC2
    Benro: A-327 tripod


    My Flickr Photos Here

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    1,923
    Tim, out of curiosity, why the Sigma 18-200mm OS, over the Nikkor version? I don't think the Sigma is likely to perform better, and isn't really much cheaper.
    Nikon D40 + kit lens

    Nikkor 50mm f/1.8 D AF(...or not)

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    4,222
    Quote Originally Posted by fionndruinne View Post
    Tim, out of curiosity, why the Sigma 18-200mm OS, over the Nikkor version? I don't think the Sigma is likely to perform better, and isn't really much cheaper.
    I play with the idea of getting the Nikkor but it still means over $300 difference.
    Nikon D90, D80
    Nikkor 16-85mm AF-S DX F/3.5-5.6G ED VR, Tamron SP AF 28-75mm F/2.8 XR Di LD Aspherical (IF) macro, Nikkor 50mm F/1.4D, Nikkor 50mm F/1.8D, Nikkor AF-S VR 70-300mm F/4.5-5.6G IF-ED, Sigma 105mm F/2.8 EX DG Macro ||| 2x SB800 | SB600 ||| Manfrotto 190XB

  9. #19
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    670
    I didn't think the difference was that big. When the Sigma was announced, its MSRP was higher than Nikon's, and they were almost the same price on the street. Now, it seems that the Sigma's street price is much lower than list, as tends to happen with half of their lenses.

    Nikon: D300, D700, Nikkor: 24-70, 70-200, 70-300/VR, 24/2.8, 35/2, 50/1.4G, 60/2.8G, 180/2.8,
    Sigma: 10-20, 50-150/2.8, 50/2.8, Tamron: 17-50/2.8, 28-75/2.8, Tokina: 12-24, Zeiss: 25/2.8
    Olympus: E-520, E-3, 7-14, 9-18, 11-22, 12-60, 14-35/2, 14-54, 35-100/2, 50-200, 25/2.8, 35/3.5, 50/2
    Panasonic: G1, Leica: 14-50, 14-150, 25/1.4
    Sony: A700, A900, 24-85, 35-70, 70-210/4, 20/2.8, 24/2.8, 50/2.8, T 90 macro, Zeiss: 24-70/2.8, 135/1.8
    P&S: Canon S90, Panasonic: LX3


  10. #20
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    God's Country - Australia
    Posts
    10,221
    have i missed something ? why are you looking at an 18-200 lens which won;t give you near the quality of the 18-50 sigma ? especially for that kinda money, those funds can be put to far better use elsewhere. an 80-200 f2.8 af-d, 50-150 sigma f2.8, macro lens, wide angle etc etc
    D800e l D60 IR l 16-35 f4 l 24-120 f4 l 24G l 50G l 60G l 85G l 105VR l 300VR l XE-1 l 18R l 35R
    flickr

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).