Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: Horse Photos

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hunterdon County, NJ
    Posts
    75

    Horse Photos

    I have been working on my post processing work flow. These are some images I shot a few weeks ago. All are shot with my 70-300mm G lens. C&C Please.
    Attached Images Attached Images      
    Tony_V
    If the results don't agree with the theory, believe the results and invent a new theory...
    Nikon D300, Nikon D80, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, Tamron 17-50 F2.8, Nikkor 70-200 F2.8 AF-S VR, Nikkor 18-135 F3.5-5.6 Kit Lens, SB-800, MB-D10, MB-D80, Manfrotto 679B.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, City of Casinos, City of Sin -- Must be Las Vegas!
    Posts
    1,512
    I like her form a lot better than the others. Regarding the post processing comments, I'll leave that up to the photoshop masters.
    Canon G10 - Nikon D3 - Sony P&S - Flickr Account - Non-updated Website

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    3,650
    They look fine, what did they look like before post? what did you do in post?
    I thought about who I am... and realized I was an
    unformed, unreconciled imagery, without "GOD"


    NikonD?
    and some other Nikon stuff

    0.0%

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    God's Country - Australia
    Posts
    10,424
    look a tad washed out and soft on my screen. i picked my 2 favourite ones and added levels and curves and sharpening. beautiful animals.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    D800e l V3 l AW1 l 16-35 l 35 l 50 l 85 l 105 l EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75
    flickr

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    516
    Try using a polarizer filter. That might help out considering its a full blast sunny day.
    Small Town Newspaper Oaf

    East Coast Coorespondant for CRAWL Magazine!!??

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    3,650
    OK I took the two that I liked. Couple of camera raw adjustments along with a curve adjustment ofr two. mostly played with shadows and tint in camera raw. I went back and changed the first one a little used the burn tool and tried to neutralize the blown highlites in the young lady. Hope you don't mind us editing the pics.





    Last edited by XaiLo; 09-23-2007 at 06:51 PM.
    I thought about who I am... and realized I was an
    unformed, unreconciled imagery, without "GOD"


    NikonD?
    and some other Nikon stuff

    0.0%

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,148
    Tony, if you shot them in raw you might be able to recover some of the blown highlights. Especially skin tones. If you did shoot them in raw and this is after fixing them, then you really just over-exposed them slightly.

    I have some horseback riding photos that I took on a family outing (15 of us). It was a bright sunny day but strangely had a very slight haze at ground level, and was kinda challenging... But shooting raw, paying close attention to the histogram they came out pretty good. One of my favorite tools is the Threshold adjuster... I have used this tool in both Bibble and PaintShop Pro, and it is very helpful with slight adjustments to the extremes by helping to condense the dynamic range in the shadows (giving depth) as well as the highlights (helping to bring back highlights). Less drastic than using highlight recovery, and fill tools. Curves also help, since colors may be a bit washed in such bright conditions.
    Nikon D70s
    Nikkor 50mm 1.8D (If you don't have it you need it)
    Nikkor 18-200mm VR II
    SB-600
    Bogen/Manfrotto Tripods/Heads
    NAS (D300, Nikkor 80-200mm (or 70-200mm)f/2.8, Tamron 90mm Macro)

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Hunterdon County, NJ
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by XaiLo View Post
    They look fine, what did they look like before post? what did you do in post?
    I shoot in RAW with saturation and contrast set to minimum. They are always dull right out of the camera. I use Capture NX to batch convert the raw images to 16 bit TIFF applying the out of camera noise reduction and if necessary do any bulk adjustments. Then i use Lightroom for final adjustments.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooz View Post
    look a tad washed out and soft on my screen. i picked my 2 favourite ones and added levels and curves and sharpening. beautiful animals.
    To me on my screen yours looked a bit harsh at first but as I went back and forth yours are better. I made some corrections and I am going to upload some again later tonight.

    Quote Originally Posted by XaiLo View Post
    ...Hope you don't mind us editing the pics.
    No I don't mind in fact I like to see what other folks can do and are looking for. There are many amazing photos on this forum and a lot of talent.

    Quote Originally Posted by LR Max View Post
    Try using a polarizer filter. That might help out considering its a full blast sunny day.
    I thought of this unfortunately the cheap 70 to 300 G lens filter mount rotates when focused.

    Quote Originally Posted by tcadwall View Post
    Tony, if you shot them in raw you might be able to recover some of the blown highlights. Especially skin tones. If you did shoot them in raw and this is after fixing them, then you really just over-exposed them slightly.
    These are shot in RAW and processed. I will have to see if Lightroom or Capture NX has a threshold adjuster.

    Thank you everyone for your comments. As I posted above I will post some updated images this evening.

    Tony
    Tony_V
    If the results don't agree with the theory, believe the results and invent a new theory...
    Nikon D300, Nikon D80, Nikkor 50mm F1.4, Tamron 17-50 F2.8, Nikkor 70-200 F2.8 AF-S VR, Nikkor 18-135 F3.5-5.6 Kit Lens, SB-800, MB-D10, MB-D80, Manfrotto 679B.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    1,148
    FWIW:

    Xailo, your edit seems a bit drastic imo... No shot here, just commenting. The saturation and contrast seem a bit overdone.

    Since the thread is really about PP... Or at least it became that...

    There is a great 3rd party plugin for saturation in Bibble called "Sadie", and it allows you to select a color range to be affected, and then allows you to re-map the color as you change the saturation for the range. That is helpful to get more pop on certain colors without affecting everything. There is also a plugin for skin tones (I think called "Gina"). It allows you (via sliders) to select skin tones, and then modify the hue, etc. Really nice.
    Nikon D70s
    Nikkor 50mm 1.8D (If you don't have it you need it)
    Nikkor 18-200mm VR II
    SB-600
    Bogen/Manfrotto Tripods/Heads
    NAS (D300, Nikkor 80-200mm (or 70-200mm)f/2.8, Tamron 90mm Macro)

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    3,650
    tcadwall, no worries, you're absolutely correct. I've come to enjoy punching colors. I was just trying to show what is possible a quik and dirty edit. What I would normally do is adjust the alpha on the different adjustment layers to get the result I want along with some masks.
    I thought about who I am... and realized I was an
    unformed, unreconciled imagery, without "GOD"


    NikonD?
    and some other Nikon stuff

    0.0%

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •