I can't make my mind up about this one. The photo, of course, doesn't do justice to the real view. I'm not sure if I should have tried to include more of the (unexciting) foreground silhouette or cropped it out all together. What do people think?
Canon EOS 5D III
Canon EF 24-105mm f4L IS, 70-200mm f4L IS
Canon GP-E2, Eye-Fi Card
"when should I violate the Rule-of-Thirds?"....huh whats the Rule-of-Third??
A little background on the picture...I was driving past this scene, obviously couldn't click it while driving....so stoped and parked on the pavement (luckily no security was around), ran back and took this...
Film Nikon EM, Series E lenses 50mm f1.8|28mm f1.8|100mm f2.8, Sigma 80-200mm f4.5-5.6 Minolta Riva 100AF, Sinpo PQ-3, Olympus mju-III wide 100, Yashica 635 Digital Sony cybershot W90, cybershot T90 Canon A720i|400D|7D|5DMKII|85mm f1.8|24-105mm f4|135mm f2|40mm f2.8|430EX II*2|BG-E3|BG-E7 Sigma 24mm f1.8|50mm f2.8|105mm f2.8 Samyang 8mm fisheye Portfolio
"when should I violate the Rule-of-Thirds?"....huh whats the Rule-of-Third??
You can read about the rule of thirds here. You "violated" it because your horizon is (almost) centered vertically in the photo. But the colours are so lovely that the "violation" really doesn't seem to detract from the photo.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by faisal
