Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   

View Poll Results: Would you prefer our reviews on a single page, or spread out over a few pages?

Voters
302. You may not vote on this poll
  • Single page

    270 89.40%
  • Multi-page

    18 5.96%
  • Don't care either way

    14 4.64%
Page 1 of 10 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 92
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Oakland, CA
    Posts
    1,205

    Single or multi-page reviews?

    Which would you find easier to read? I've been a fan of the single page format but am curious as to what you, the readers, think.

    Thanks,
    Jeff
    Jeff Keller
    Founder/Editor, Digital Camera Resource Page

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    2,198
    I am in full agreement with you. Would love to see this become more common place.
    _______________
    Nikon D3, D300, F-100, 10.5 Fisheye, 35 f/1.4, 50 f/1.4, 85 f/1.4, Zeiss 100 f/2, 105 f/2.5, 200 f/4 Micro, 200 f/2 VR, 300 f/2.8 AF-S II, 24-70 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8, SU-800, SB-900, 4xSB-800, 1.4x and 1.7x TC
    (2) Profoto Acute 2400 packs w/4 heads, Chimera Boxes

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    God's Country - Australia
    Posts
    10,421
    yepp 1 pagers are the way to go.
    D800e l V3 l AW1 l 16-35 l 35 l 50 l 85 l 105 l EM1 l 7.5 l 12-40 l 14 l 17 l 25 l 45 l 60 l 75
    flickr

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    North Eastern India
    Posts
    653
    +1 for the Single Page Format
    You first see a photo with your mind, and then capture it with your camera!

    Canon - EOS 50D | BG-E2N | 70-200mm f/4 L IS | 400mm f/5.6 L | Sigma - 18-50mm f/2.8 EX | 30mm f/1.4 EX | 150mm f/2.8 Macro EX | | Misc - 430EX | OC-E3 | EF-12 Ex Tube | Kenko Teleplus 300 Pro 2x TC | FotoFile Backpack AW | Lowepro Nova 3 AW | Tripod | Panasonic FZ5.

    My Flickr

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,124
    I actually like multi page more since it lets me reference the specific thing I want to and not "look at the review and scroll down a lot"

    Plus I'd imagine it would save on bandwidth long term if folks didn't need to load everything to read any part of it.

    Tim

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kapellen, Antwerp, Belgium
    Posts
    345
    definately single page. I don't like reading a part of a review and then have to wait for the next part to be loaded.

    Retired: Fuji A205S
    Current: Fuji F6500FD

    My album -> http://wutske.deviantart.com/
    My blog -> http://my.opera.com/wutske

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Formerly South Wales. Now South Carolina.
    Posts
    7,147
    I can't stand multiple page reviews.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    3

    Actually, I like both

    I like the multi-page to be able to refer to a specific part of the review, but I sometimes like to print the reviews and like a single-page, print-ready format.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Langley, BC, Canada
    Posts
    2

    Single Page for Jeff-Style Reviews

    I agree with you Jeff on your reviews being one-page material. For in-depth extensively detailed reviews like Phil Askey does, multi-page works better, for quick reference to specific parts of the review. But thanks for asking!

    Neal
    No box is big enough to contain an imagination

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    207

    Thumbs up

    I, too, am a fan of the single page format...
    CATS! & a few other things... http://catographer.smugmug.com

    Fuji S6000fd

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •