Need help on deciding a 70-200 (Canon mount)

[ILoveTifa]

Hi everyone :

Right now I'm in the middle of deciding to buy my dream lens : a 70-200! Fellow readers, please help me decide between these lenses. Any comments are greatly appreciated. Thank you in advance!

Lenses in order of preference :

1. EF 70-200 f/2.8

Why I didn't get this lens yet : Not weather sealed. Not a big issue. Still my favourite lens

2. EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS

Why I didn't get this lens yet : Three copies of this lens that I tried have a bad case of purple fringing. Anyone have a good copy of this lens? Is the IS version any good at all? Reviews at Photozone indicated that this lens suffered from chronic QC issues

3. EF 70-200 f/4 IS

Why I didn't get this lens yet : Still deciding on the above. This lens competes heavily with f/2.8. According to Photozone, this lens is very sharp. That's why I'm split between 70-200 f/2.8's large aperture, and 70-200 f/4's sharpness. For comparison between these two lenses, please visit http://www.the-digital-picture.com/R...9&LensComp=242

4. Sigma 70-200 f/2.8

Why I didn't get this lens yet : My friend's lens (Nikon mount) suffers from softness at f/2.8. User reviews at FredMiranda suggests that not all Sigma suffer from this issue. Maybe someone would like to share a crop of your Sigma taken at f/2.8? Thank you.

I need to have this lens before June, since I'd be using it extensively during that month (and many years to come ) If Tamron manages to release their 70-200 f/2.8 before then, better. If not, then I guess I'm stuck between these big four. Thank you very much!

And finally, I have a question : Would you prefer a slightly unsharp picture with a good bokkeh, or a sharp picture with a slightly bad bokkeh? (This, of course, refers to the f/2.8 and the f/4 IS above )

Cheers!

ILT

[RichNY]

Time for meds

[aparmley]

It is my understanding that the 7-2 2.8 IS is a standard/workhorse lens fo professionals and countless other enthusiasts. Of all the lenses listed I think one would find the 7-2 2.8 IS to be regarded as the cream of the crop.

[cdifoto]

2. EF 70-200 f/2.8 IS

Why I didn't get this lens yet : Three copies of this lens that I tried have a bad case of purple fringing. Anyone have a good copy of this lens? Is the IS version any good at all? Reviews at Photozone indicated that this lens suffered from chronic QC issues

Yeah this lens totally blows:

[cwphoto]

Great example CDI, chalk another one up for the 70-200/2.8 IS.

[cdifoto]

Thanks CW. I post that image too much but it seems to fit quite a few bitch-slap-reality situations.


Plus it was recent enough to be fresh in my memory...

[DonSchap]

You usually need a good sky background to get a decent looking purple fringe. I've got some crappy overcast going here, today ... so it may not be good enough to attempt it ... but the 70-200mm f/2.8 IS is mounted and ready. Maybe at lunch ... I'll shoot some bare branches. We still have plenty of them around here. Who knows, we may be lucky and get some CA, too!

I don't recall, but do you get the "purple stuff" when you use a CP polarizer, or does it correct for it? Coldrain?

What the hey, I'll shoot a few of both.

[coldrain]

Can you show any purple fringing example?
Purple fringing is not a product of bad QC at all, it is just when too much light reaches the sensor and reflects back, some lenses reflect it back to the sensor again, creating a violet blue-ish or red-ish fringe around the bright spots into dark surroundings.

When one lens of a lens type does that, all do that. You can stop the purple fringing by stopping down (this lessens the amount of light). It only will happen with open aperture and very bright light sources. So it should not be a problem in normal photography life (the 70-200 f2.8 L IS USM is not exactly known for being a bad purple fringer).

Example please...

[DonSchap]

100% Crop - No polarizer


From this

Canon EOS 20D w/ EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS USM
@ 70mm - f/10 - 1/500 sec. - ISO 200 - 0 setp EC - Program Normal

If I had a bit more time ... I'd have gone manual: widened the aperture to f/2.8, lowered the ISO to 100 and stepped up the speed to 1/2000th. It would have been close, but it would display more of the edge-effects. I only have so much time for lunch ... so

You have to take the crop to 1600%, minor CA is there ... but zee fringe, she is not.

Tol' ya ... crap for sky! We have at least 10 more days of this, too!

[lucav]

And finally, I have a question : Would you prefer a slightly unsharp picture with a good bokkeh, or a sharp picture with a slightly bad bokkeh? (This, of course, refers to the f/2.8 and the f/4 IS above )

Unsharp with good bokeh, no doubt for me.
You can quick and easily sharpen in post-processing, whereas changing the background is surely more painful.

Bye,
Luca