Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 217 of 1818 FirstFirst ... 1171672072152162172182192272673177171217 ... LastLast
Results 2,161 to 2,170 of 18180
  1. #2161
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    PNW
    Posts
    45
    What exactly is it you don't like? Too contrasty, underexposed, oversaturated? It might be nicer if the ball was not in the shade but... care to elaborate? Looks fine to me...
    Pat

    Nikon D80
    18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G ED II AF-S DX
    55-200mm f/4.5-5.6G ED AF-S DX VR
    Legacy non-AF Nikkor/Nikon glass:
    28mm f/2.8, 35mm f/2.8, 50mm f/2, 100mm f/2.8, 135mm f/2.8, 50-135mm f/3.5, 100-300mm f/5.6

  2. #2162
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Bay Area, California
    Posts
    1,546
    Its a good photo but I too dont like the dark parts. Looks really weird how the players are lit and the ball is a shadow, almost looks like the ball was photoshopped in or something.
    Nikon D90, D40 Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 | Sigma 50-150mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 35mm f/1.8
    Vertical Grip, SB-600, SB-24, Sunpak 433D, Metz 40AF-4N, Alienbees CyberSync Triggers

    R3G Media | Flickr

    "You're pulling some awesome action shots with a cam and lens that are supposed to be rubbish ! " - Rooz

  3. #2163
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,924
    Quote Originally Posted by r3g View Post
    almost looks like the ball was photoshopped in or something.
    Reggie you are brilliant!
    I will Photoshop in a "lit" ball.

    The park where they played yesterday is the worst place to take photos. It's completely surrounded by forest that is all sorts of green shades and when the sun is shining like yesterday the ground has places that are spotlit and other places that are black with shadow. The same applies to the backgrounds.
    Apart from anything else I had a $%^& day and the team lost.

  4. #2164
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Delfgauw, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,207
    Thanks for your comment K1W1. I tried to grow some trees on the slope in photoshop, but I didn't succeed yet.

    My picture of the day: a waterfall in the Yorkshire Dales:

    Name:  GB05.jpg
Views: 233
Size:  207.5 KB
    Nikon D-50
    // Nikkor 70-300 f/4-5.6 VR // Nikkor 50 mm f/1.8
    // Sigma 17-70 f/2.8-4.5 ...// Nikon SB-600
    // Sigma 10-20 f/4-5.6......// Nikon Series E 135 mm f/2.8
    // Kiron 105 f/2.8 Macro....// Manfrotto 190XPROB + 488RC4
    // Nikkor 35 f/1.8..........// Sigma 500 mm f/8

    My website: http://www.dennisdolkens.nl

  5. #2165
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    370
    This fireplace is located at the top of a hill on a cliff on the Lake Superior shore in MN. No one knows who built it or why, but they think it was built in the early 1900's. Odd spot for a fireplace!

    28mm, f/7.1, 1/320, ISO 100 and some CS3 fun (mostly deep color pop, but probably a bit overdone - I like it, though)

    Last edited by Kellie; 08-26-2007 at 08:20 AM.
    "Saturate yourself with your subject and the camera will all but take you by the hand." ~ Margaret Bourke-White

    Nikon D80 ~ Tamron 28-75/2.8 ~ Nikon 50/1.8 ~ Tamron 90/2.8 Di Macro ~ SB-600

  6. #2166
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    370
    Cool capture, Prospero. The trees are so green and the threatening sky adds a great effect!
    "Saturate yourself with your subject and the camera will all but take you by the hand." ~ Margaret Bourke-White

    Nikon D80 ~ Tamron 28-75/2.8 ~ Nikon 50/1.8 ~ Tamron 90/2.8 Di Macro ~ SB-600

  7. #2167
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    209
    Here is one of the photos from my first session with the new D80. I haven't played with any fill flash yet however. The mother to be was a squinter, even in the shade, so I never got any good shots of her eyes.

    Thanks for looking

    D80 w/55-200mm VR @ 92mm
    Exposure 1/250
    f/6.3
    ISO 100

    Nikon D200 w/Nikon MB-D200 | Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 | 2 SB-800's & 2 SB-600's
    http://www.stillframesbynick.com/

  8. #2168
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Portland, OR
    Posts
    1,205
    Quote Originally Posted by Classic96 View Post
    Here is one of the photos from my first session with the new D80. I haven't played with any fill flash yet however. The mother to be was a squinter, even in the shade, so I never got any good shots of her eyes.

    Thanks for looking

    D80 w/55-200mm VR @ 92mm
    Exposure 1/250
    f/6.3
    ISO 100
    Nice shot Classic. Is the lady in the picture pregnant? The guys head on her stomach leads me to beleive so? Thats a cool pose!

  9. #2169
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    209
    Yeah she is.. another month or so to go. I shot some photos just now of my wife with the fill flash and I greatly regret not trying it yesterday. I never had great results with it using the D50. At least the photos I took yesterday were just for friends and not paying clients
    Nikon D200 w/Nikon MB-D200 | Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 | 2 SB-800's & 2 SB-600's
    http://www.stillframesbynick.com/

  10. #2170
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    209
    Hope no one minds if I break the rules and post 2 in one day. Here is on of my wife and her new tattoo of our son's name.

    50mm f/1.4
    SB-800 fired with diffuser on
    Exposure 1/200
    f/3.5
    Editing done in PS CS3

    Nikon D200 w/Nikon MB-D200 | Nikkor 17-55mm f/2.8 | Nikkor 80-200 f/2.8 | 2 SB-800's & 2 SB-600's
    http://www.stillframesbynick.com/

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •