Never seen one of those before Tim well done. And nicely captured too.
D800, D300, D90, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200VR f2.8, 300 F4, 105 micro, 16-85VR, 50mm 1.8, Tammy 90 macro, 70-300VR, SB900, 2xSB600, MB-D10, 055XPROB 322RC2. New computers to run photoshop faster. C&C always appreciated. PhotoGallery
Pressing the shutter is the start of the process - Joe McNally ... Buying the body is the start of the process - Dread Pirate
D800, D300, D90, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200VR f2.8, 300 F4, 105 micro, 16-85VR, 50mm 1.8, Tammy 90 macro, 70-300VR, SB900, 2xSB600, MB-D10, 055XPROB 322RC2. New computers to run photoshop faster. C&C always appreciated. PhotoGallery
Pressing the shutter is the start of the process - Joe McNally ... Buying the body is the start of the process - Dread Pirate
Question for you DPR: I noticed you don't have any really wide lenses for your D300. Do you not have a need for one, or are you waiting for when you go to full frame?
Thanks for the positive comments, that shot is about to be a massive canvas on my study wall.
Here's the other shot I had to choose from but didn't select for the wall.
Very observant JR. I have been waiting to go full frame for a year but the Thailand flood delayed the D800 release on me , I really like 16mm (=24 equiv) as a focal length and have been waiting to get that width from my 24-70. Also someone on here (maybe Rich?) once postulated that togs tend to see in one focal length and struggle to see shots outside it, if that's valid then I'm more a telephoto man and have been trying to adapt to see the world wider.
D800, D300, D90, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200VR f2.8, 300 F4, 105 micro, 16-85VR, 50mm 1.8, Tammy 90 macro, 70-300VR, SB900, 2xSB600, MB-D10, 055XPROB 322RC2. New computers to run photoshop faster. C&C always appreciated. PhotoGallery
Pressing the shutter is the start of the process - Joe McNally ... Buying the body is the start of the process - Dread Pirate
Back in my FSLR days I had a 24mm - Now I also the 16-85 which starts at the equiv of the old 24
and that mostly enough for me - I wouldn't mind something wider - but would not use
it that often.
Nice work by the way
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by tim11
, I really like 16mm (=24 equiv) as a focal length and have been waiting to get that width from my 24-70. Also someone on here (maybe Rich?) once postulated that togs tend to see in one focal length and struggle to see shots outside it, if that's valid then I'm more a telephoto man and have been trying to adapt to see the world wider.
