So what you saying Reg, it is a mystery that I should get anywhere near the top? LOL
Joking with ya, it is odd how they decide. Some shots are total crap, no doubt about it.
It is only my fith photo to even make explore. Heard they made recent adjustments to the selection process,
but who knows if there is any real ryhme or reason to it.
Just thought it was cool.
D90 with the 18-105 kit lens M-Rock Yellowstone bag, 35 mm F1.8 G, and a SB-600 Flash
Wants: Too many and I need to become a better photographer first anyway!!
Head north 'til you smack a polar bear, then crank it back 50 miles.
Posts
424
After a long hiatus during haying and harvesting, I finally got a chance to break out the Sigma 50mm again.
What did I learn from this?
1) I do not have 1mm the talent that Rooz has.
2) I missed not firing off a single shot in several months.
3) My kids are very protective of their toys.
City of Lights, City of Casinos, City of Sin -- Must be Las Vegas!
Posts
1,512
Another Porsche photo....
I also upload a few "still" photos of a nice looking Shelby convertable, the batmobile, and I few others but I prefer the action photos. That's why I am going to start checking out my drifting photos now.
Congrats Rich on Explore front page . My max position has been #49
I think Explore has to do with the nos of Fave and Notes your picture gets, which are more imp then the nos of comments. Also a interesting Title/description and tags adds upto the chances to have your pics into explore, Geotagging also accelerates your chances.
Adding it to any award/comment group (like post 1 award 3 types) will kill any chances you got to be into explore .
Flickr
Canon 500D Kit || 50 1.8 || Sigma 10-20 HSM EX || Slik Pro 340DX || Hitech GNDs + B+W #110
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by rawpaw18
Of course I don't do any of the things ANP suggested
