Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 10 of 64

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Near St. Louis
    Posts
    3,528

    No No No, Am I Nuts?

    Well. . . I'm heading down to florida for a week in April and I was saving for a special lens. . . the 24-70 or the 70-200 2.8 L. But, no tax return this year and unexpected $700 repair on my car has ruled out the possibility of getting the 24-70 by vacation time. I was heavily considering that one over the 70-200 due to its convenience factor as a walk around for the trip - yea its heavy but the images are worth it. . . It couldn't be heavier than all my primes in a bag and its way more convenient than switching constantly. . .

    But, I did get paid this weekend for some senior shots I did - so I got that going for me. Which will be able to afford me an alternative. I'm thinking Tamron 28-75 xr di at this point - Am I nuts? LOL.
    Nikon D90 | Sigma 10-20 HSM | DX 18-105 f3.5-5.6 VR | DX 55-200 VR | 35 f/2.0 D | 50 f/1.4 D | 85mm F/1.8 D | SB-800 x 3 | SU-800
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Flickr | Twitter

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Crapville, Australia
    Posts
    5,148
    No more nuts than CDI.
    Christian Wright; Dip Phot
    EOS 5D Mark III | EOS 600D | EOS-1V HS
    L: 14/2.8 II | 24/1.4 II | 35/1.4 | 50/1.2 | 85/1.2 II | 135/2 | 180/3.5 Macro | 200/2.8 II | 400/2.8 IS | 16-35/2.8 II | 24-105/4 IS | 70-200/2.8 IS II | 100-400/4.5-5.6 IS
    580EX II | EF 12 II | EF 25 II

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,163
    No more nuts than I.
    Ouch.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Near St. Louis
    Posts
    3,528
    Is there an echo in here?
    Nikon D90 | Sigma 10-20 HSM | DX 18-105 f3.5-5.6 VR | DX 55-200 VR | 35 f/2.0 D | 50 f/1.4 D | 85mm F/1.8 D | SB-800 x 3 | SU-800
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    Flickr | Twitter

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    2,124
    Ok the great 24-70 debate..

    Here is my take on it. If you get a good copy of the tamaron then great. It's obviously slower AF, and there is more QC issues, and it's not weather sealed BUT I don't think its worth it for that range unless you NEED absolute the best image quality. The price difference is very dramatic.

    Having said that though, I wouldn't buy a new one. Check the forums and fredmiranda see if you can find a good used one. Paying retail new cuts the "value" of the lens versus a canon.

    Tim

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    6,590
    I would not buy a 2nd hand Tamron f2.8 28-75mm, especially because it is one of those lenses that is either loved or discarded... you are likely to get one of the soft ones.

    Another lens that seems to be gaining some fans lately is the Sigma f2.8 24-70 DG. Again, I would not buy it 2nd hand, especially since its a rather new version... so any 2nd hand ones would be from not so happy customers.

    But since you have set your heart on the Canon EF f2.8 24-70 L, you probably will not rest till you have one, so the lens you are getting now may be just intermediate? Since Florida is sunny, maybe it is a good idea to go for something cheap but good, like the Canon EF 28-105 USM II? It will focus faster, if not more accurate. I feel that with all these you do lose out in the wide angle end though... I do not know if you like to take wide shots. And while it is not expensive, the Tokina 12-24 is not really cheap either...
    Canon EOS 350D, Tamron SP AF 90mm F/2.8 macro, Sigma 18-50mm F2.8 DC EX, Canon EF 70-200mm f/4 L USM, Tokina AT-X124 Pro 12-24mm F4, Soligor 1.7x C/D4 DG Teleconvertor, Manfrotto 724B tripod, Canon Powershot S30

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •