Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Page 1 of 7 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 65
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,175

    DSLR Lens Reviews Submission Form

    DSLR Lens Reviews Submission Form

    This is the submission form for lens reviews. They are organized and linked to in an orderly manner here (Canon) and here (Nikon).


    REVIEW FORMAT - NO EXCEPTIONS

    1) ONE REVIEW PER POST. NO EXCEPTIONS. If you have multiple reviews, it's still one review per post. Post your review ONLY in this thread. Do not start a new thread.

    2) In the TITLE of your post, you must include...

    - Full name of the lens (Brand, mount, focal length, aperture)
    - Your rating of the lens on a scale of 1-10 where 10 is the highest.

    (Example "Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 - 9")

    3) In the BODY of your post, specify...

    - Whether you think the lens is worth it (yes or no)
    - Whether you would buy the lens again (yes or no)
    - Then provide a brief review of the lens in a format of your choice (every has used Pros/Cons/Would I buy this lens again? so far). Write 150 words minimum, but do not exceed 500 words in most cases.

    There are many examples of reviews below for reference. You are encouraged to copy and paste an existing review to form the basis for yours.

    Thanks for participating. Your input is appreciated.

    - Rex914

    -----------------------------------------------------
    [START COPY - Don't forget the title!]

    Is this lens worth the price? Yes or No
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes or No
    ____________________________________

    Pros: List out the pros of this lens in complete sentences or coherent fragments.

    Cons: List out the cons of this lens in complete sentences or coherent fragments.

    Would I buy it again? Say WHY you would or wouldn't buy this lens again.

    [END COPY]
    Last edited by Rex914; 12-17-2005 at 12:07 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,175

    Thumbs up Canon EF 50mm f/1.4 - 9

    Is this lens worth the price? Yes
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes
    ____________________________________

    Pros: List out the pros of this lens in complete sentences or coherent fragments. I would touch on build quality, sharpness wide open and stopped down, contrast, color redition, quality of bokeh, etc.

    Cons: List out the cons of this lens in complete sentences or coherent fragments. would touch on build quality, sharpness wide open and stopped down, contrast, color redition, quality of bokeh, etc.

    Would I buy it again? Say WHY you would or wouldn't buy this lens again.
    Last edited by Rex914; 12-17-2005 at 12:09 AM.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,175

    Thumbs up Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 Mark I - 8

    Author: ReF
    Is this lens worth the price? Yes
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes

    ------------------------------------------

    Pros: This is the sharpest and highest contrast lens I own. f/1.8 can be very useful.

    Cons: Slow and loud AF, bad bokeh - pentagon shapes instead of circles. bad bokeh severly limits the use of the large aperture for creative shooting.

    Would I buy this lens again? This lens was purchased about 15 or more years ago and no one in my family even remembers what the cost was. Given that one in good condition on ebay costs between $75-100, I would spend the extra $$$ for the f1.4 version to get the faster, quieter USM version with better bokeh. That's just me though; I'm sure many people wouldn't be willing to spend 3-4x the cost for the upgrades.
    Last edited by Rex914; 11-15-2005 at 04:32 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,175

    Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 XR Di - 9

    Author: ReF
    Is this lens worth the price? Yes
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes

    ------------------------------------------

    Pros: extremely high sharpness and contrast for a zoom. second in sharpness and contrast under the 50mm f1.8 mk I out of the lenses i own. great price, good build quality, small and light, decent macro performance for a lens of this type (though not at all comparable to real macro performance) AF noise level well controlled.

    Cons: slowish focusing, not alway accurate at 75mm.

    Would i buy it again? yes, i would definately get this lens again if necessary, unless for some reason i could get a canon 24-70L for $650. the only thing i really feel needs improving is the focusing speed (which I hear the canon delivers). it's actaully decent - faster than the 50mm.
    Last edited by Rex914; 11-15-2005 at 04:32 PM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,770
    Thanks Rex: there are so many blah blah threads, its a great idea to have these sticky indexes that keep the good ones from getting lost in the forest. It does encourage a bit more care and effort too, knowing all the good efforts won't just get flushed in a week or two.

    So; it looks a lot like the FM review model.
    Gear List:
    Some links I like: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,770

    Tamron 28-75 f/2.8 Macro XR Di - 9

    Is this lens worth the price? Yes
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes (actually; if it were stolen, I'd probably pay 4x for the Canon 24-70 f2.8L)

    ------------------------------------------

    Pros: Accurate and acceptibly fast AF in most situations. Very sharp, good contrast, very low CA. Light, good build quality. f2.8 top-to-bottom is very useful and i've only noticed a very slight quality fall-off wide opened.

    Cons: Dim lighting AF difficulties, lacks the punch of a good prime. 28mm minimum is slightly long bottom-end for a walk-around lense, and 75mm is occassionally lacking, but of course I knew that going in. I'de only consider these cons when comparing it against a similar zoom with better range.

    Comments: This lense replaced my kit about 3 weeks after my 20D purchase. It's taken nearly every shot since and I've been nothing but satisfied. I've heard of a lot of bad copies but luckily, not mine.

    That said; I'll probably replace it with the Canon 24-70L f2.8L or Canon 24-105 IS f4.0L. I had use of a Canon 135 f2.0L for a while and got spoiled by the elegance of L Glass.
    Gear List:
    Some links I like: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    251

    Canon 70-200mm f4 L: Rated 9

    Is this lens worth the price? Yes
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes


    Pros: good walk around lens, quiet and fast focusing, good price new, sharp images, great bokeh.

    Cons: No tripod collar(expenssive to buy), not ideal for indoor or low light.

    Review:

    Well after owning a Sigma 70-300mm APO Macro DG and getting this lens, it’s definitely a different league. I do think that the Sigma lens is a great all around consumer lens for the price, but it just wasn’t cutting it for me.

    I quickly learned that you have to pay the price for quality glass, and the only serious “L” series lens I contemplated on getting was the 70-200mm F.4 L and the F2.8 and the 2.8 IS version.

    Both F2.8 was way over my budget and though I would’ve loved this lens I found myself looking at the F4 and found a great deal for a used one. A few days later and $600CAD later I was a proud owner of the Canon 70-200mm F.4 L

    I was immediately impressed with the quality of images this lens produced. Color and contrast was richer, bokeh is very smooth and with a steady hand or mounted on a tripod this lens produces sharp images. I compared my shots with the Sigma and though the sigma got soft from 200-300mm it wasn’t that far in sharpness compared to the Canon lens. However, the bokeh is much nicer and because of this, in my opinion the canon seems sharper giving the image a 3d look. The images seem to pop out at you. If you are anything like me, I still had a hard time getting sharp images on the long range due to my own lack of ability to hold the camera still, stopping down helps combined with a higher shutter speed. This is where I wish I could afford the 2.8 IS. However with good technique images are sharp on all focal lengths. I still have much to learn in regards to technique. This lens also makes great portrait pictures, great for outdoor shots. I use this lens with my Canon Digital Rebel XT (350D) and together, it is a sweet combination.


    Build:

    The body of the lens made out of metal I believe is very sturdy and well built. At 705g it’s still light enough to use as a walk around lens. A few people have complained about the off white color but I like it, especially in the hot sun, it doesn’t attract as much sun as a black lens would, but heads will turn to see what in the world you are holding.
    This is the first time I’ve had a lens with USM (ultrasonic motor). Man is it ever quiet compared to the Sigma. I was so used to the noisy motor that when I first used this lens I was pleasantly surprised how quiet it was. Focusing is fast in good light but struggles a bit in shade or low light situations which are expected at f4. The inner focusing is great as well, compared to lenses like my Sigma that extends and can attract dust.

    Price:

    For a relatively new photographer like myself, this lens is a great buy even new; however it is quite pricey here in Canada starting at $800CAD before taxes. If you can find a used one in great condition for around $500U.S I would highly recommend this lens. With the results I’ve been getting from this lens, I quickly forgot the money that was spent on it and I’m very pleased with it. In the long run, it would prove to be a good investment.

    Conclusion:


    This lens will be loved by amateur or pro, it delivers sharp quality images with good technique, compact enough for a walk around zoom. Being the cheapest L zoom lens in the “L” series line up, this lens gets top marks from me. I’ll have this lens in my bag for a long time…unless I get a wealth of money somewhere one day and I can afford the f2.8 L IS, this lens is my baby!

    Would I buy this lens again? Yes, definitely! having said that, although i love this lens, having either of the 2.8 versions would appeal to me more, mainly for the faster focusing. Now if they made a 2.8 version built like the f4 with IS, that would be perfect.
    Last edited by Tyger; 11-14-2005 at 09:57 AM.
    Canon Digital Rebel 350D (XT)
    Canon 100-400mm F4.5 L, 85mm 1.8 18-55mm,

    You create your reality.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    2,175
    Keep them coming.

    Once we have 10 or so, I can start setting up the thread for them.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    1,770

    Canon 135L f2.0. Rating 10

    Is this lens worth the price? Yes
    Would I buy this lens again? Yes (and plan to)
    ------------------------------------------

    Pros: Amazing clarity and sharpness, a sort of "sepia" indescribable pro-quality to the images, impressive build qualty, high contrast, silent internal focus, full time manual focus (switch only disables Auto). Deserving of the Canon "Holy Trinity" prime membership.

    Cons: DOF is so shallow at f2.0 the shots are often slightly OOF so it takes getting used to, AF hunts is very dim lighting.

    Comments: This lense (alas, sold for budget reasons) was a result of my quest for prime excellence. The build quality was immediately noticable. I took it everywhere and mounted it at every opportunity. Of course; its not appropriate for all occasions, nor is it's increadible f2.0, but for distant scenes or subjects, theater, and tight shallow DOF shots, it's amazing.

    On a 1.6 crop, its definately not a walk around lense, but for situations calling for that general length, there is none better.

    My shooting style calls for a shorter lense much more often than not so I expect to buy a few other lenses first, but some day, when I want to again own the cream of the crop so I can just sit and marvel at its results (regardless of how seldom I actually use it), I'll go get another.

    At $900, for one of probably the top 5 lenses for a Canon mount, its a bargian.
    Last edited by Vich; 11-14-2005 at 08:40 PM.
    Gear List:
    Some links I like: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Grafton, MA
    Posts
    1,714
    Don't know if this is the right post for this, but I have compared a few lenses that I've had the privelege to use over the past year.

    Canon 28-105 3.5-4.5 vs 28-70 2.8L:
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14168

    Sigma 10-20 f4-5.6:
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11629

    Sigma 55-200 f4-5.6 vs Canon 75-300 f4-5.6 IS vs Canon 80-200 2.8L
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=9582

    Sigma 18-50 f2.8 vs Tamron 28-75 f2.8 vs Canon 18-55 EFS vs 50 f1.8II
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=5937

    Peleng 8mm f3.5 Circular Fisheye:
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7851

    Sigma 24-70 f2.8 vs Tamron 28-75 f2.8 vs Canon 80-200 f2.8L:
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=6306

    Canon 17-40 f4:
    http://www.dcresource.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10929

    Sorry for the rehash, but I was too lazy to type it all again!
    Last edited by jamison55; 11-15-2005 at 03:54 PM.
    www.jamisonwexler.com

    Canon 5dII|Canon 5D|Canon 40D|Sigma 15 f2.8|Canon 35 f1.4|Canon 50 f2.5|Canon 50 f1.8|Canon 85 f1.2|Canon 17-40 f4|Canon 18-55 f3.5-5.6 IS|Canon 24-105 f4 IS|Canon 28-105 f3.5-4.5|Canon 70-200 f2.8 IS|Canon 75-300 f4-5.6 IS|Kenko 1.4x TC|Canon 580ex X3|Canon 380exII |Canon 420ex|Sunpak 383 x4|Sunpak 120j x2|Sunpak 622|Elinchrom Skyports

    Past Gear

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •