Home News Buyers Guide About Advertising
 
 
 
   
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Monopods

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,807

    Monopods

    been trying to choose a monopod/head setup and man are there a lot of choices! i've been flipping through a large catalogue and a few stood out:

    monopods:

    manfrotto 680, 1.8lbs, supports 22lbs, for $46.95
    http://www.adorama.com/BG680.html

    slik "mono pod" 350, 13oz, supports 8lbs, for $29.95

    manfrotto 484RC2 mini ball head, supports 8.8lbs with quick release plate, it has an aluminum housing and an "extremely hard" phenolic resin ball, for $51.95
    http://www.adorama.com/BG484RC2.html

    cullman CU-1747 delux monopod, with 2 way head, quick release mount and plate, retractable 3 prong foot for only $64.95
    http://www.adorama.com/CU1747.html


    lots of monopod newbie questions:

    i've never used a monopod before. if i'm pushing down on it a bit to steady the camera, will the monopods' max lbs. load rating come into play? i mean, in real use does even a cheap monopod ever buckle or retract under moderate downward pressure?

    would getting a monopod that supports 22lbs (the manfrotto) be useless/overkill if my ball head only supports 8.8 lbs?

    is a phenolic resin ball considered good or crappy? i thought they were all metal but it's made by manfrotto so i'm not sure what to think of it.

    has anyone heard of the Cullman brand before? that delux monopod has a lot included for a low price, but does anyone know if it's any good? would the 2 way head be difficult to use?

    are those three prong retractable feet useful? flimsy? there is also an add on version by manfrotto for $40.

    sorry for so many questions. i'll be going to a local store when i have time to answer some of my own question, but i doubt they'll have all the models i listed to compare and try out.

    are the prices listed decent, as in what one expects to pay for a monopod setup, or is it too much?

    would like to hear comments on the items listed above, as well as what you guys/gals personally use and or anything else that can be recommended.

    thanks
    canon 17-40 L, 70-200 f2.8 L, 400 f5.6 L, 50 f1.4 & f1.8, 1.4x TC, sigma 15 f2.8 fisheye, flash 500 DG Super, kenko extension tubes

    note to self: don't participate in sad, silly threads unless you're looking for sad, silly responses.

    "anti-BS filter" (from andy): http://dcresource.com/forums/showpos...94&postcount=4

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    4,146

    Monopods

    Ref-

    Here is my experience. I bought a no-name carbon fiber monopod with case for $19.95 at our local Fred Meyer Store (part of the Kroger chain). It does not have a ball head on it, but it stated that it would support 8.2 pounds of camera weight. That makes me think that that weight rating is just the dead weight capacity rating. I have used it with all of the dSLR's including the Canon 20D, which is the largest/heaviest. In addition, my husband has used it for his Canon GL2 video camera which is even bigger, and quite a load.

    In the process of taking photos we have really borne down on it, with no problems at all. It extens to 68 inches and folds to 18 inches, making it a nice size to pop into a suitcase for travel.

    We have used it for over a year and feel that it has been an excellent investment. Oh yes, a sidebar note. The first monopod I purchased was a heavy Manfrotto ($50 with shipping) and it has remained at home and gets used very infrequently indeed due to it size. I believe it is 27 inches when collasped.

    Sarah Joyce

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,807
    thanks, that helped a lot. couldn't ask for a better reply
    canon 17-40 L, 70-200 f2.8 L, 400 f5.6 L, 50 f1.4 & f1.8, 1.4x TC, sigma 15 f2.8 fisheye, flash 500 DG Super, kenko extension tubes

    note to self: don't participate in sad, silly threads unless you're looking for sad, silly responses.

    "anti-BS filter" (from andy): http://dcresource.com/forums/showpos...94&postcount=4

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,163

    Slik 350

    You mentioned the Slik Mono Pod 350. I have that one and use it for Bigma + Rebel XT without any problems whatsoever. It's rated at 8lbs I think but I have an industrial scale, so I decided to test it out. I fully extended the monopod and put it on the scale. I then pressed down on the top of the monopod to see how much weight it could really handle. I had applied about 21.75lbs of pressure before it started to give way...at the clasps. What I mean is that the clasps weren't gripping tight enough to withstand 21.75lbs of pressure. The monopod started to slide closed. The pole itself was fine...

    Good enough for me @ $35 shipped from B&H. Bigma is one of the heavier lenses out there at 4.5lbs...I don't know of any dSLR bodies that weigh more than 17lbs.

    It weighs in at 10 ounces and is 21.25 inches when closed so it's quite portable as well.
    Last edited by cdifoto; 07-28-2005 at 07:27 PM.
    Ouch.™

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Charleston, SC
    Posts
    2,364
    I'm going with the feisol monopod.
    US Navy--Hooyah!

    Nikon D700/D300|17-35 f/2.8, 24-70 f/2.8, Sigmalux, 80-200 f/2.8, 16 f/2.8 fisheye,

    Lots of flashes and Honl gear.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Monterey Bay
    Posts
    5,495
    I've been using the Manfrotto 679 with a simple ballhead and retractable base spike (about $80 total). I use it as a walking stick for hiking when the camera isn't mounted and use it almost every time I shoot. I'm buying the pistol grip quick release and folding base (makes it into a camera stand) this weekend.
    D7000, D70, CP990, CP900, FE + a lens or 6.
    Ha! See, I can change...


    http://d70fan.smugmug.com/

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia
    Posts
    140
    My setup if very similar to George, it's great to have while hiking around.
    "The real world begins right outside our doors --the world of nature, with remarkable beauty and diversity for all of us to discover." Kenn Kaufman

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

 

All content, excluding forum posts, is © 1997 - 2012 Digital Camera Resource Page LLC (R).