Search:

It may be good enough to satisfy you. It sounds like it is. I hope you are very happy with it. However, if I spend $700 for a camera, I expect it to perform above this level in terms of image...

You've got to be kidding? I registered on that site, so I could download the FULL resolution of the pictures. Just take a look at any of the pictures with sky in them. They are grainy and chock...

Well, I based my decision on the posted sample pictures - not solely on the review. Jeff's review merely confirmed what I and most others who had seen those pictures had already observed -- that the...

Above poster said "firmware can fix it." Alas, I don't think so. Its a basic problem of signal/noise ratio. All that can be done through firmware is perhaps improve the noise removal (smoothing)...

It's like building a Lamborghini and then deciding to put a VW Beetle engine in it. Well, as some reviewers might say, "but 95% of your driving is going to be in traffic in the city anyway...."

I, for one, am extremely disappointed. This camera has everything I want - except the ONE main thing you buy a camera for - quality pictures. I guess my search goes on. I thought Jeff went much...

Wait at least until the reviews come out -- which should be within week or so. I have a feeling that, based on the sample photos which have surfaced to date, the FZ30 may disappoint. I hope not --...

Yeah, but when you buy a camera you want to be able to know that you can whip it out and - on full auto - be able to get acceptable shots. These shots are not great at all. The blue sky in the...

I have been going through a major search to choose a replacement for my old Canon Rebel (non-digital) camera. I thought I had found it in the FZ30 - but those sample pics posted on this site are...

The samples I saw on the Japanese Panasonic web site are very good - at least to me. But the highest ISO they have exhibited is ISO 100. I used the Google translator to find my way around their...