Rhys
04-15-2005, 09:32 AM
I've just looked at Jeff's photos from the Canon XT. Is it just me or are Canon's greens slightly muddy?
I've looked at the photos from all of Jeff's dSLR reviews and have noticed:
Canon - muddy details
Olympus - soft images
Nikon - better for detail and focus but still not that great.
The sharpest camera I've seen so far is the Sigma SD10 but that was let down badly by being under-megapixeled, over-grained (at high ASA) and by apalling lenses.
Are any of these DSLRs really worth the money they cost? From what I've seen, and from their short lives, I'm tending to doubt it.
I've looked at the photos from all of Jeff's dSLR reviews and have noticed:
Canon - muddy details
Olympus - soft images
Nikon - better for detail and focus but still not that great.
The sharpest camera I've seen so far is the Sigma SD10 but that was let down badly by being under-megapixeled, over-grained (at high ASA) and by apalling lenses.
Are any of these DSLRs really worth the money they cost? From what I've seen, and from their short lives, I'm tending to doubt it.