ZCarroll
04-13-2005, 12:17 PM
The important things to me are decent unlimited movie avi (NOT quicktime!), fast cycle time between pictures, long flash range, excellent photo quality in indoor low light situations (and able to focus lock quickly in those situations), and pocketable. I tried the sony dsc-w1 and absolutely loved it except for very disappointing photo quality, the movies went in and out of focus (I don't know why it did that, they were awesome other than that?), and skin tones got bleached out and no way to manually adjust white balance. I've tried a pentax optio s40 and loved it, except incredibly, painfully slow cycle times between pictures and again not so great photo quality (better than the sony, however and also I could always see everything in the lcd whereas the sony's lcd was barely visible most of the time for me). I also tried a samsung digimax v70, beautiful pictures and seemed to do everything I want, although not quite as fast cycle time as I'd like (I had a defective one though so not sure if it would be faster if it worked properly, also the lcd had a delay not sure if that was normal for this model or part of the defect) and it has the quicktime format (boohoo!).
Is the sd500 the answer to my prayers? I mostly take pictures of my kiddums, in the house, on the stage, at the park, in the woods, with other people, etc. I had an olympus d400z for years that never gave me a bad picture so I'm mystified as to why I've had so much trouble with blur, noise, red eye, over/under exposure, loss of detail, etc. with all the higher pixel cameras I've tried. I don't really feel I need or want a 7mp camera (given I was able to print gorgeous 8x10s from cropped pics from my 1.3 mp oly so it seems photo quality beats more pixels hands down) but I figure if it's got all the features I want more pixels can't hurt?
Is the sd500 the answer to my prayers? I mostly take pictures of my kiddums, in the house, on the stage, at the park, in the woods, with other people, etc. I had an olympus d400z for years that never gave me a bad picture so I'm mystified as to why I've had so much trouble with blur, noise, red eye, over/under exposure, loss of detail, etc. with all the higher pixel cameras I've tried. I don't really feel I need or want a 7mp camera (given I was able to print gorgeous 8x10s from cropped pics from my 1.3 mp oly so it seems photo quality beats more pixels hands down) but I figure if it's got all the features I want more pixels can't hurt?