Lewiedude
01-29-2005, 10:30 AM
I stopped by at the local digicam retailer specifically looking at the record/shutter lag/next shot speed differences of these three cams.
Well, the SD300 blew the other two away, shot review was turned off in each. The A95 was faster than the A510...and about the A510, it really seemed to take a long time to get to "ready" mode for the next shot, especially with the flash on. But, I am surprised that the SD300 only comes with 4MP. The A510, although smaller and lighter than the A95, seems to be less of a camera than the A95-obviously. And as for the A95, with CF storage and all, possesses the most manual settings, I am back to being confused. I enjoyed the software/screens of the SD300 much more, and especially enjoyed the ability to switch on the fly among the 5 or 6 settings for the builtin flash. I wish the A95 came with the new screens of the SD300 and some of the additional settings, but I can't justify the additional money for 1 less MP and less ability to control the settings in strange lighting situations...ISO settings/Aperature/Shutter Speed. Image quality seems to be compromised with the SD300 as that is a steady complaint I have found in and among this web site.
I know there are trade-offs for each of the models, including the price. If price is not object, which to choose among the A95 or the SD300? I am really wondering what the other 2 new cameras to be released from Canon are going to be...any thoughts?
Well, the SD300 blew the other two away, shot review was turned off in each. The A95 was faster than the A510...and about the A510, it really seemed to take a long time to get to "ready" mode for the next shot, especially with the flash on. But, I am surprised that the SD300 only comes with 4MP. The A510, although smaller and lighter than the A95, seems to be less of a camera than the A95-obviously. And as for the A95, with CF storage and all, possesses the most manual settings, I am back to being confused. I enjoyed the software/screens of the SD300 much more, and especially enjoyed the ability to switch on the fly among the 5 or 6 settings for the builtin flash. I wish the A95 came with the new screens of the SD300 and some of the additional settings, but I can't justify the additional money for 1 less MP and less ability to control the settings in strange lighting situations...ISO settings/Aperature/Shutter Speed. Image quality seems to be compromised with the SD300 as that is a steady complaint I have found in and among this web site.
I know there are trade-offs for each of the models, including the price. If price is not object, which to choose among the A95 or the SD300? I am really wondering what the other 2 new cameras to be released from Canon are going to be...any thoughts?