View Full Version : Scared about buying Nikon 5200 online???
tech70
08-09-2004, 07:07 PM
Hi
I m new to this forum.
I wanted to buy Nikon 5200. After checking out the priceat B&H, J&R, Circuit City, And few more stores....I checked out that online prices are lower than what these stores are offering?
I am concerned beacuse I have never shopped online for this, and not aware of online stores.
I checked out at nikon site also for buying the camera;
17TH STREET PHOTO SUPPLY
ADORAMA
ALKIT
BHT CORPORATION
B & H PHOTO-VIDEO
CALUMET PHOTOGRAPHIC
CAMERA LAND
D M CARLICK ....
this is half the list of authorized dealers. But I have my concerns about online stores?
Can anybody advise...?
tech70
My phillosophy about online shopping is that for most things, it's simply not worthwhile.
Ask yourself this question about even honest online camera dealers:
If there's a problem with my camera, how much extra will it cost to return and how much do I value the time I will be cameraless?
I looked at the last few cameras I've had:
Secondhand Olympus C820L - not wonderful but a good introduction
New Olympus C200Z - returned for replacement because of faulty CCD. The replacement was fault-free.
New Nikon 885 - returned for refund because of faulty CCD.
New Nikon 995 - no problems.
New Nikon 3100 - no problems.
New Canon S1 - no problems.
While cameras I've had have had faults, they're definitely in the minority. Having said that, sending it by registered post back to the shop for a replacement is going to eat into any saving made over buying locally. The other factor is time - how long will it take, even if the webshop can get another for you?
My solution is to get a printout of the online prices and brandish the printout in the shop and haggle. I generally get a batter deal that way - and with the added benefit that I can walk into the shop to get a refund/exchange if needed.
Generally, I'd say shop locally. I do buy my memory cards from webshops though.
tech70
08-13-2004, 06:55 PM
Thank you Rhys....
I did decide to buy locally....few more people also told me the same thing.
What do you think about Adorama & B&H? Which one is the preferred store?
I think I am nervous because I have never shopped at these stores??
I have Canon camera ...which I bought it few years back in LA.
I am new to New York also...I think thats why I m more nervous!!
Any input would be appreciated!!
Thanks
tech70
08-13-2004, 07:35 PM
Rhys
I have been reading your reviews in this forum.
I would like you to share the benefit of your knowledge....as I have no idea about Camera's digital world.
Infact how would you compare Sony DSC-P100/Sony DSC W-1 and Nikon 5200?
I heard that Sony DSC P100 has better color and lens than Nikon 5200.
Any views or opinion on that ...!!
Thank you!!
George Riehm
08-13-2004, 09:04 PM
Thank you Rhys....
I did decide to buy locally....few more people also told me the same thing.
What do you think about Adorama & B&H? Which one is the preferred store?
I think I am nervous because I have never shopped at these stores??
I have Canon camera ...which I bought it few years back in LA.
I am new to New York also...I think thats why I m more nervous!!
Any input would be appreciated!!
Thanks
B & H has a long and good reputation in the camera world. Adorama I'm not sure of. I generally buy from local camera stores or from Norman Camera in Michigan, when availability is tight. Having a good relationship with a local camera store may cost a little more, but in the long run, if photography is your hobby, it can be invaluable.
B & H has a long and good reputation in the camera world. Adorama I'm not sure of. I generally buy from local camera stores or from Norman Camera in Michigan, when availability is tight. Having a good relationship with a local camera store may cost a little more, but in the long run, if photography is your hobby, it can be invaluable.
I have no personal experience of B&H or Adorama but I have seen their adverts in an American photography magazine that occasionally appears in my local newsagent (in Britain). I've seen Adorama adverts for a few years so I guess they're legitimate. I did see some company called "Honest Abe" advertising. Based on the name, I probably wouldn't trust them.
B&H are reputable photo dealer. I've bought many a thing from them, and all transactions, whether online or in store ( I live close by ) went by fine. I've heard/seen that the way they pack their shipped items isn't good ( bounces around + breaks in box ) but I've yet to experience that...all my orders were nice and snug.
Cheers!
tech70
08-14-2004, 08:34 AM
Thanks for all the input ...!!
Did anybody experience or heard about the color problem in Nikon 5200...as compared to Sony DSC W1 or DSC P100.
I heard that Sony 's color are better than Nikon.
I have to decide which one to go for
Nikon 5200
Sony DSCW1
Sony DSC P100
I am concerned about sony....I can say they are best in Electronics...be it TV / Music System or other things. But Nikon - only manufactures cameras and related things pertaining to photgraphy ...I thot I should go for Nikon.
But after hearing comments about Nikon 5200...that pics are blurry, color not good. The pics look good on LCD and as soon u transfer to PC they are dark.??
I would go for Nikon because they have BSS , 15 shooting modes, Red Eye Reduction and the software is good ...I heard.
But when I hear about Sony - colors are better , 1.8 or 2.5 LCD, 14 bit A/D - also the Software thats in sony's box sucks....but thats least of my worries.
I am able to decide
Are all the above mentioned concerns right??
Any comments??
George Riehm
08-14-2004, 09:14 AM
Thanks for all the input ...!!
Did anybody experience or heard about the color problem in Nikon 5200...as compared to Sony DSC W1 or DSC P100.
I heard that Sony 's color are better than Nikon.
I have to decide which one to go for
Nikon 5200
Sony DSCW1
Sony DSC P100
I am concerned about sony....I can say they are best in Electronics...be it TV / Music System or other things. But Nikon - only manufactures cameras and related things pertaining to photgraphy ...I thot I should go for Nikon.
But after hearing comments about Nikon 5200...that pics are blurry, color not good. The pics look good on LCD and as soon u transfer to PC they are dark.??
I would go for Nikon because they have BSS , 15 shooting modes, Red Eye Reduction and the software is good ...I heard.
But when I hear about Sony - colors are better , 1.8 or 2.5 LCD, 14 bit A/D - also the Software thats in sony's box sucks....but thats least of my worries.
I am able to decide
Are all the above mentioned concerns right??
Any comments??
"sucks" may be a little harsh. Both Nikon and Sonys take very nice pictures, but I give Sony the nod for the "Jumbotron" LCD. All cameras have Red-eye reduction but most are only moderately effective. Any of the tiny pocket cameras will have some-to-major red-eye even with anti-red-eye on.
I am a big believer in actually trying a camera before you buy, so I suggest you take your list of favorites above and try them out. In addition I suggest you add the Canon A75 to your list. I'm a Nikon guy at heart (FE, 900, 700, 990, D70), but the Canon A75 is a winner. If I were looking for a point-n-shoot with manual controls, the A75 would be the one.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.