PDA

View Full Version : Best fully automatic Point & Shoot camera


SturmUndDrang
12-03-2008, 09:06 AM
My parents asked us kids to pool together and buy them a new digital camera for Christmas, since their old film camera has finally started to die. My parents are both NOT gadget freaks or particularly digitally savvy: they need a fully automatic point and shoot camera that has really easy to understand controls and menus, and shoots great pictures out of the box.


Lets get the standard questions out of the way:

--------------------------------------------------

Budget: $100-$250 (online OK); might go higher for a truly exceptional product

Size: compact or ultra-compact; needs to fit in a pocket comfortably

How many megapixels will suffice for you?: 8 is fine, not a problem if has more

optical zoom will you need?: at a minimum 3x, but would like more (e.g. 5X)

How important is “image quality” to you?: 9 (relative to the class of camera: I realize that DLSRs will beat most any P&S)

Do you care for manual controls?: No

What will you generally use the camera for?: the usual: indoor photos of family gatherings, outdoor photos of trips

Will you be making big prints of your photos or not?: Possibly

Will you be shooting a lot of indoor photos or low light photos?: Lots of indoor photos, but not too many night scenes

Will you be shooting sports and/or action photos?: Not too many

Are there particular brands you like or hate?: Like: Canon, Panasonic; Hate: Sony (proprietary obsessed, DRM infested snobs)

Are there particular models you already have in mind?: see discussion below

Do you need Wide Angle: Highly desirable

Do you need Image Stabilization: ESSENTIAL, will not buy a camera without it

Do you need Weatherproof: would be great to have it, but will not pay massive amounts for it either

Do you need Hotshoe: No

Do you need Rotating LCD: I consider gimmicks like that to be a bug, not a feature

--------------------------------------------------


I began doing some research. Out of the flood of reviews, I found the best summary advice to come from here:
http://www.dcresource.com/buyersguide/ (see the Best Cameras: Under $400)
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408budgetgroup/ (Group 1: Budget cameras (sub $150))

It looks like these models are some of the best choices:
Canon SD 1100 (from dcresource)
Sony DSC-150 ""
Panasonic LZ8 (from dpreview)
Sony DSC-120 ""

I went to a local camera store yesterday, and tried them all out.

I was most impressed with the Canon SD 1100: very compact, and the best user interface. Reviews indicate that it takes about as good fo pictures of any camera in its class when in automatic mode.

I was next most impressed with the Sony series. However, it requires expensive sony proprietary memory and has a more complicated interface than the Canon, which are both turnoffs.

The Panasonic was OK but a bit bulk due to its AA batteries. It did not blow me away.


Here are some questions that I have for you guys:

1) Does Canon now provide a way for you to measure how much battery capacity is left? In particular, on the SD 1100 model? I ask because for years, Canon never gave you any way to measure battery capacity. Instead, all they would do is give you a warning when the battery was about to run out, but that is too late. This was the one thing that I really hated about Canon, because I figured it was a conspiracy to force me to buy an extra replacement battery. I forgot to look into this on the SD 1100 yesterday when I was in the store...

2) does anyone own any of these models? Have any feedback to share?

3) are there other brands that I should consider?

4) is now around Christmas a good time to buy? Or should I wait a few months because some new models are coming out then?

SturmUndDrang
12-03-2008, 09:13 AM
p.s. when I was at the camera store, the clerk pointed out that they are now selling the Nikon S610 for $199 along with a free case and a 2 year (Nikon) warranty.

I actually liked that Nikon 2nd best after the Canon SD 1100 in terms of compactness and ease of user interface, and it seems to have some better specs. On the other hand, once I got home, I tried to find some reviews of it and could not find anything decent, altho I found several web references to it (e.g. on forums like this) which were less than fully enthousiastic about it. This makes me nervous.

Also, the clerk admitted that the 2 year warranty is worthless because it won't cover things like a cracked LCD screen (my current Canon's LCD cracked, but thats the subject of another thread...)

AndyfromVA
12-03-2008, 02:42 PM
I'd avoid the Nikon point and shoots as they all seem to have slow focusing. The Canon SD1100is is very good but so are the other cameras in the Elph line, the SD770is, the SD790is and the SD880is. If you can afford it the SD880is is excellent and it has a wide angle lens. Panasonic makes some good, thin cameras. The FS5 and FX35 are very good - the FX35 has a very wide angle lens. Also, even though you don't care for Sony, the W150 is a very good, small camera.

bascom
12-05-2008, 08:27 AM
I agree Sony W150 may be good but I'd rather avoid Sony, also. Pan FX37 is newer than FX35 and has a bit more zoom. SD1100 seems good but starts at 38mm so doesn't have wide angle. Yes the SD770 and SD880 have wider angle. Also, there is Canon A1000.

But I'm a bit puzzled why your parents want such a small ultracompact. Will they really carry it around in their pocket? Have they said they want ultracompact? I know my parents wouldn't like such a small one and would prefer point and shoot size and features of Canon A590. I just presumed most "older" people would prefer that. I think of ultracompacts as being toys for teens and young hipsters to carry to parties.

S_p_i_d_e_r
12-06-2008, 04:01 PM
Check out Panasonic DMC-TZ5.

BTW - your nickname comes from German literature, music or Star Wars? ;)

SturmUndDrang
12-06-2008, 10:23 PM
Pan FX37 is newer than FX35 and has a bit more zoom. SD1100 seems good but starts at 38mm so doesn't have wide angle. Yes the SD770 and SD880 have wider angle. Also, there is Canon A1000.


Thanks for that Panny rec: it looks like a great camera:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08072101panasonicfx37.asp
(wish that Jeff Keller had a review for it too...) Oh wait: the above is a press release; this review
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2332708,00.asp
is less glowing...Do you guys respect the above site and review?

The SD 890
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/powershot_sd890-review/
is certainly a better camera than the 1100 that I was thinking of, but is also more expensive and bulkier.



But I'm a bit puzzled why your parents want such a small ultracompact. Will they really carry it around in their pocket? Have they said they want ultracompact? I know my parents wouldn't like such a small one and would prefer point and shoot size and features of Canon A590. I just presumed most "older" people would prefer that. I think of ultracompacts as being toys for teens and young hipsters to carry to parties.

Who would not want as small and light a camera as possible, all things being equal? Well, they are never equal: smaller cameras tend to have inferior image quality. But the current performance of the 1100 would have been considered excellent 5 years ago in much bigger cameras, so on an absolute scale, its performance may be just good enough.

The only other issue that I can see for people with a small camera is if it gets difficult to use the controls or something.

Thanks much for your feedback, by the way!

SturmUndDrang
12-06-2008, 10:32 PM
Check out Panasonic DMC-TZ5.

Thanks--will check it out tomorrow.


BTW - your nickname comes from German literature, music or Star Wars? ;)

The second, particularly this composer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schubert

AndyfromVA
12-07-2008, 07:11 AM
Thanks for that Panny rec: it looks like a great camera:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...asonicfx37.asp
(wish that Jeff Keller had a review for it too...) Oh wait: the above is a press release; this review
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2332708,00.asp
is less glowing...Do you guys respect the above site and review?


I've seen a few negative comments about the soft picture quality of the FX37 (the FX35 was very sharp). This may be a noise reduction issue or a lens issue.
See this from dpreview:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408slimgroup/page8.asp
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/Q408slimgroup/page11.asp

S_p_i_d_e_r
12-07-2008, 07:19 AM
I've seen a few negative comments about the soft picture quality of the FX37 (the FX35 was very sharp). This may be a noise reduction issue or a lens issue.

While the FX37 has the same Venus Engine IV processor as the FX35, I think the noise reduction system may have been turned up to eleven for the new camera. Noise reduction effects are now plainly visible from 200 ISO upwards, blurring fine detail and fine gradations of tone. 400 ISO looks very messy and and the 800 and 1600 ISO settings are best avoided altogether. I was just beginning to believe that Panasonic was making some progress against its perennial noise problems, but in this respect at least the FX37 is a big step backwards.

http://www.trustedreviews.com/digital-cameras/review/2008/09/05/Panasonic-Lumix-FX37/p3