PDA

View Full Version : Plenty of 50D pictures at ISO 6400


guillermovilas
10-17-2008, 06:08 AM
http://philippeluyckx.zenfolio.com/p736765772

:) Good results , similar to Nikon's D300 :)

TenD
10-17-2008, 06:25 AM
Wow, those look good. That's certainly the biggest advance in DSLR technology IMO.

VTEC_EATER
10-17-2008, 07:53 AM
Whats up with the banding I see in the ISO 12800 shot?

You can see it in the trunk lid of the Mercedes.
http://philippeluyckx.zenfolio.com/p736765772/h23f23f80#h23f23f80

I noticed this same banding on the 40D's ISO 3200 shot in Jeff's review:

Easily viewable in the sky:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/eos_40d-review/nightshot3200.jpg

There is a distinct horizontal pattern to the noise, and its kind of distracting.

I will say, however, that the ISO6400 shots don't look too bad. With some post processing, they could be quite usable.

I cant remember how my D300 is at ISO6400 because I never shoot that high.

guillermovilas
10-17-2008, 10:18 AM
Whats up with the banding I see in the ISO 12800 shot?

You can see it in the trunk lid of the Mercedes.
http://philippeluyckx.zenfolio.com/p736765772/h23f23f80#h23f23f80

I noticed this same banding on the 40D's ISO 3200 shot in Jeff's review:

Easily viewable in the sky:
http://www.dcresource.com/reviews/canon/eos_40d-review/nightshot3200.jpg

There is a distinct horizontal pattern to the noise, and its kind of distracting.

I will say, however, that the ISO6400 shots don't look too bad. With some post processing, they could be quite usable.

I cant remember how my D300 is at ISO6400 because I never shoot that high.

Yeah , bandind seems to be a problem at 12800 , but i doubt many would use this level of ISO , i'm just happy with the ISO 6400 results .

shoey
10-19-2008, 06:36 AM
There is banding on the 6400 shots as well:(

Is it visible on the 3200 shots. Not really blowing my mind with the ISO detail.

Is it any better if you shoot in RAW?:confused:

guillermovilas
10-20-2008, 03:14 AM
There is banding on the 6400 shots as well:(

Is it visible on the 3200 shots. Not really blowing my mind with the ISO detail.

Is it any better if you shoot in RAW?:confused:

I haven't tried Raw yet , i'll let you know.