fotogmarc
10-06-2008, 12:53 PM
I'm confused (or aspiring to turn pro) and I hope that you folks can help me with this.
Nature shots interest me the most. I like to take the 200-300 shots and hopefully choose one that is good enough to hang on my wall. Then I have another 10-20 that I consider good, but in my opinion don't belong in a frame.
Reading numerous photo magazines I see many images that I consider good, but not enough to use as a "hanger". Do editors choose images for their artistic value or do they keep a well rounded field to add more geography?
Having read a number of composition books and studied the rule of thirds, the golden triangle, Gestalt theory and when not to use them, some of these photos don't offer me much in the way of composition or pleasing to the eye.
A National Geographic photographer said that he may take 3000-5000 shots for one artcle and only use 5-6 images. Again do they select these pics for impact, beauty, interpretation?
Or is this all me where I need to learn the difference between art and journalism? :confused:
Nature shots interest me the most. I like to take the 200-300 shots and hopefully choose one that is good enough to hang on my wall. Then I have another 10-20 that I consider good, but in my opinion don't belong in a frame.
Reading numerous photo magazines I see many images that I consider good, but not enough to use as a "hanger". Do editors choose images for their artistic value or do they keep a well rounded field to add more geography?
Having read a number of composition books and studied the rule of thirds, the golden triangle, Gestalt theory and when not to use them, some of these photos don't offer me much in the way of composition or pleasing to the eye.
A National Geographic photographer said that he may take 3000-5000 shots for one artcle and only use 5-6 images. Again do they select these pics for impact, beauty, interpretation?
Or is this all me where I need to learn the difference between art and journalism? :confused: