PDA

View Full Version : Looking for low light, good macros, and 5x or more zoom


jbrukardt
05-10-2008, 12:24 PM
Budget

* under 350 dollars for the camera (additional can be allocated for accessories, lenses, batteries, sd cards, etc)

Size

* size does not matter

Features

How many megapixels will suffice for you? I would like 6 at a minimum, but something larger like 10 or 12 to capture additional detail would be excellent

* Ultrazoom would be nice, but I would like at a minimum 5x zoom

* I would like to be able to take decent videos, this is about 5 out of 10 on importance, but it would be nice for occasional use

* How important is “image quality” to you? proper contrast, detail, and sharpness are a 9 to me. Color reproduction is a 7

Do you care for manual controls?

I would rather have it just take great pictures without messing with controls, but im not entirely sure thats possible, so im willing to fiddle with manual controls

General Usage

* Indoor, semi-low light photography
* Macros, both indoor and out
* Portraits (no advanced lighting, just of myself mainly, that fit condition 1, indoors, and not great lighting)

* Will you be making big prints of your photos or not? No

Will you be shooting a lot of indoor photos or low light photos?

Absolutely

Will you be shooting sports and/or action photos?

Yes, there is a chance shots will be taken from a moving vehicle. This is less important to me than all the above however.

Miscellaneous

Are there particular brands you like or hate?

Like

I had a Fuji 2600Z for about 5 years, that absolutely loved, it took spectacular pictures with no effort or adjustment at all. Basically, what im trying to do is duplicate the quality i got with that fuji in a modern camera with more options.

Here are some examples of photos i took with the 2600Z
http://picasaweb.google.com/jbrukardt/PCPictures

None of those took any adjustment at all, just point and shoot basically, and in my opinion they came out amazingly.

I am looking for that kind of ease, and quality again, in a modern camera, with the additional features of good low light/indoor photography.

Dislike

After doing a ton of research (somehow missed this forum though) 6 months ago to replace that fuji, I ended up going with a Ricoh R6, and since i got it, i havent been able to take a single photo that even came close the the 5 year old fuji. Ive played with every settings on the camera and have become extremely frustrated with it. It seems to hate hate hate low-light, and either introduces so much grain (even with manual low ISO settings) that the picture is unusable, or if you turn the flash on, it oversaturates everything, even with synced/slow flash. Taking a picture of a white piece of paper from 5 feet away (birthday card in front of a bunch of presents) turns the card into a glow in the dark aberation that blinds out the rest of the photo no matter what i do. In short, the ricoh, in my hands seems horrible at determining proper contrast.

Are there particular models you already have in mind?

I have been looking at the Canon S5 IS for its excellent macros

(If applicable) Do you need any of the following special features? (Wide Angle, Image Stabilization, Weatherproof, Hotshoe, Rotating LCD)

Image stabilization
hotshoe (if its necessary on modern cameras to alleviate my oversaturated flash issues indoors?) the fuji never had that problem.

KCook
05-10-2008, 04:26 PM
The Canon A650 IS gets good ratings. Including for its macro performance.

Kelly Cook

jbrukardt
05-10-2008, 04:41 PM
Taking a look at the Canon A650 (did some reading earlier, about how its very similar to the G9 in sensor).

Ive been looking at the Fuji F100 all afternoon, i realize it just barely came out, but opinions on the SuperCCD in that? MY biggest concern of all of the above is actually crisp indoor (comparatively low light, jsut from a lamp or something) photography

AndyfromVA
05-10-2008, 09:11 PM
From the sample photos I've seen, the Fuji F100 is excellent in low light and seems to give good quality pictures as high as 1600 ISO.

jbrukardt
05-10-2008, 11:19 PM
I did look at a lot of F100 sample photos, but it seemed that most of them were outdoor or high light samples.

Happen to have a link to the low-light ones you saw?

AndyfromVA
05-11-2008, 06:17 AM
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/default.asp?newsID=3440&review=fuji+f100
Look at the crops of the playing cards. The ISO 1600 crop looks a little grainy, but not too bad. The ISO 800 crop looks excellent.

jbrukardt
05-18-2008, 01:43 PM
Any experiences with that fuji, or other advice?

It seems that fuji is basically the only choice for low light photography, would that be correct? In addition, on the higher end, if i wanted to spend more what would be the best fujis