olenzekm
01-10-2008, 05:48 PM
I have a general question about how sensor size relates to pixel count and pixel size.
I have an 8 MegaPixel Canon A720. I realize that it has a small sensor size. I am willing to accept that because I want a small shirt-pocket camera.
I do not really need to take pictures with the 8 MP resolution. This camera is capable of producing images at lower pixel recording levels such as 5 MP. That level is adequate for me.
My question is: is there any advantage, other than the memory consumed by the image, to shooting 5 MP pictures in a camera that is capable of 8 MP rather than shooting the full 8 MP?
In other words will shooting at 5 MP result in the effective sensor area for each “pixel” being larger than the effective sensor area for each pixel when shooting at 8 MP? Or are some of the pixels on the sensor simply ignored to record the image at a lower MP level thereby simply wasting the extra pixels?
Thank You,
Marc.
I have an 8 MegaPixel Canon A720. I realize that it has a small sensor size. I am willing to accept that because I want a small shirt-pocket camera.
I do not really need to take pictures with the 8 MP resolution. This camera is capable of producing images at lower pixel recording levels such as 5 MP. That level is adequate for me.
My question is: is there any advantage, other than the memory consumed by the image, to shooting 5 MP pictures in a camera that is capable of 8 MP rather than shooting the full 8 MP?
In other words will shooting at 5 MP result in the effective sensor area for each “pixel” being larger than the effective sensor area for each pixel when shooting at 8 MP? Or are some of the pixels on the sensor simply ignored to record the image at a lower MP level thereby simply wasting the extra pixels?
Thank You,
Marc.